BiloxiSurveillance has left the forum

callipygian

Well-Known Member
MAZ said:
So ghandi kiss the ass of the those who really do no good to the forum to keep the peace if you want, I'd rather tell it like it is.
Speaking of doing no good to the forum, what have you contributed?

Prior to flaming BiloxiSurveillance, your previous post was July 15th, posting in, not surprisingly, a rant thread about Injuns and flaming other posters.

MAZ said:
Of course you did, must have been all those red chips you were betting like in your blog picture. Have another drink.
Before that was June 30th, posting about a link to indices, flaming other posters.

MAZ said:
It figures these numbers come from Semyon's website, he can't even copy a chart accurately. Hey mdlbj, check with your boys over at BJI and tell me if they agree with some of the numbers on this chart. I bet they don't all match with the ones you were supposed to have learned at your seminar. Tsk, Tsk, when will you ever learn. Maybe you need a refresher course.
Before that was May 9th, posting about casino cheating, flaming other posters.

MAZ said:
Its more like 99% of house cheating occurs in the mind of disullisioned wannabe counters.
Before that was April 8th, on a statistics puzzle thread, flaming other posters.

MAZ said:
Do you feel better getting all that off your chest? Now have yourself a good cry and settle down. Let me guess, you're a college kid that needs his knowledge spoon fed to him with no ability to obtain answers from questions not directly spelled out for you. Get over it and stop being just another sheep in the flock.
Before that, April 2nd, on an ace steering thread, flaming other posters (but you actually contribute something besides an insult in this one!)

MAZ said:
Alright this is your first post in the thread saying how if you do steer aces then its usually to the dealer and its a powerful tactic. Then as you realize that is a ridiculous statement you change your tune to make it more of a defensive move, which is all it is. Last time, if you have to give an ace to a dealer you either made a mistake in your previous hands, or you just don't understand the advantage of the ace. Granted in very few instances, it may be the move to make, but if you're good, which you better be if your even trying to play this way, you find a way to set up for the next round or better yet don't get yourself in the jam of having to hand it to the dealer. If your goal is to set up the dealer for a bust you DO NOT do it with an ace. Look at the indecision in Monkey's posts, that should be enough to tell you its not right. Man, playing methods like these are hard enough, you don't need the bad advice to make using it impossible.

And just for the record, steering and predicting through sequencing are totally different animals. When sequencing you have much less accuracy then steering. Sequencing depends on other cards and is dealer dependent on the shuffle. Steering is actually seeing a card and cutting to it and steering it to the hand of your choice. Neither is easy and I really doubt most here can do it. But from reading this thread I definitely know who can't.
March 26th, flaming other posters ...

MAZ said:
I'll tell you what kid, why don't you invest that money with a seasoned pro until you're ready to use it yourself. I happen to know one, who will be willing to do that for ya and maybe teach you something along the way. You seem like a trusting soul, wattaya say pal?
March 19-20th, flaming other posters, zero content again ...

MAZ said:
I will admit I was wrong about one thing, with all your guessing you still can't get it right. I gave you a little too much credit. Something for you, if you have to put the ace in the dealers hand, than you misplayed your hands leading up to the money round. Which by the way won't be the round you use the ace because of your bad play leading up to it you didn't get to put the money up for a potential dealer bust round. By the way, if you are steering with key cards you are not very bright, and since you are blind as a bat through your own admission, you shouldn't be steering cards anyway. I'm out for a while, feeding the trolls as they say, is getting tiresome.
MAZ said:
Now I know you're just a jammy boy and not a real player. You are assuming way too much about unknown cards to really be playing any kind of steering game. You DO NOT weaken an aces value by trying to create stiff hands or posssible multi card busts. The only cards a skilled player will try to steer to a dealer are 5 and 6 as a hole card, very difficult and I know you can't do that. Or as I explained earlier a 10 as a potential bust card. You are looking for a bust, not to draw out a hand. You either make it with the 1 card or you have not accomplished the highest percentage steer. Not to mention you will not be betting properly if you decide after the round is dealt to put the ace in a potential bust hand. No player capable of steering would ever waste an ace in the manner you describe. On top of that the only real way to steer cards is heads up or with a team. Any other way the variance will kill you. Keep trying son, if you keep guessing you're sure to get something right sooner or later.
(this last one has a little bit of content)

MAZ said:
Alright maybe its me, but you're not making any sense. If the dealer is showing a 10, and say his down card is a 2, if you steer your ace as his draw card to me it only adds up to 13. So I don't get the logic of saying 17 is going to be his best hand. He has a chance at many different totals. If you knew the holecard its a whole different story, but in your example thats not the case. Besides when you're steering cards if you are steering to the dealer you want to have the best percentage of either 2 things happening. Busting him, or getting the card yourself the next round if the dealer doesn't use it. I wouldn't waste an ace on the chance it will just get lost in a 4 or 5 card hand. Steering aces to a 9 or 10 up is the flat out the wrong move.
Are you a professional troll, or someone's alt-nickname that they use to stir up trouble? Five months and 1.5 posts of content doesn't exactly make you the arbiter of justice here.
 

MAZ

Well-Known Member
callipygian said:
Speaking of doing no good to the forum, what have you contributed?

Prior to flaming BiloxiSurveillance, your previous post was July 15th, posting in, not surprisingly, a rant thread about Injuns and flaming other posters.

This is an inside joke about this poster and his drunken posts and wild exclamations he makes while toasted. Harmless but true.

Before that was June 30th, posting about a link to indices, flaming other posters.

This was in fact pointing out incorrect indice info, I guess you missed that.

Before that was May 9th, posting about casino cheating, flaming other posters.

This is valid info to decrease paranoia of those intelligent enough to get it.

Before that was April 8th, on a statistics puzzle thread, flaming other posters.

Now that had a little heat on it, but still neede to be said to free ones mind of foolish thinking.

Before that, April 2nd, on an ace steering thread, flaming other posters (but you actually contribute something besides an insult in this one!)

Of course it was a contrbuting point. As I have already stated I will not mince words on false information. I may be saving someones bankroll.

March 26th, flaming other posters ...

A sarcastic joke, get a grip dude.

March 19-20th, flaming other posters, zero content again ...

Same topic as before. Bad info being righted.



(this last one has a little bit of content)

Ditto.

Are you a professional troll, or someone's alt-nickname that they use to stir up trouble? Five months and 1.5 posts of content doesn't exactly make you the arbiter of justice here.
Listen man I don't have the time or the interest to post dozens of times everyday like some here. If you get off your self righteous stance and look at what I really say you might get it. As you have said before to me if you don't like it don't read it. So when I do take the time to say something its usually got some sting to it with some meaning connected because for those who know better there is an awful lot of crap to wade through. I just can't do that.
 

callipygian

Well-Known Member
MAZ said:
If you get off your self righteous stance and look at what I really say you might get it. As you have said before to me if you don't like it don't read it. So when I do take the time to say something its usually got some sting to it with some meaning connected because for those who know better there is an awful lot of crap to wade through. I just can't do that.
What makes you think I don't "get it"? That I don't agree with you? Just because I think BiloxiSurveillance is a fraud doesn't mean that you're right.

If you don't like a thread, just don't click on it. If you think a thread is so bad that it would mislead people, then post something constructive to set people straight. If you're so busy doing whatever it is you're doing that you can't wade through the crap that new posters post, then find a board that's more selective in who they allow to register.

Moreover, when threads like "I'm a surveillance guy!" and "I'm a girl!" and "I'm Arnold Snyder!" show up, there's no need to sh** up the thread with rampant speculation about who they really are. If they're really surveillance, or if they really have a vagina, or if they're really Arnold Snyder, then you're just being a dick by continuously posting your suspicions. If they're not, and just posing as such, then you're just fueling their quest for attention. That's why DNFTT is an acronym - trolls slither away if they don't get the attention they want. Vote with your posts.

If you really feel that passionate about exposing BiloxiSurveillance as a fraud, then just do it in one thread. Leave the other thread for people who want to ask real questions. If you think ___(insert female poster's name here)___ is really a 15-year-old with sexuality issues, then just do it in one thread. Leave the other threads for people who want to ask real questions. We don't need multiple, concurrent threads, each with the exact same content.
 

shadroch

Well-Known Member
Of course,you could start your own BJ forum and be queen of the land,just as easily.Until then, I'd take it easy on telling members how they should or shouldn't behave.
Bonus points for the first person to figure out which episode that security cam shot of The Montecito came from.
 

callipygian

Well-Known Member
shadroch said:
Of course,you could start your own BJ forum and be queen of the land,just as easily.
True, but I'd point to Sonny as an example of being helpful even when people are morons and just letting threads die quietly if they're not useful. If he doesn't explicitly agree with me, he certainly does it by example.

I'm not going to start a whole "callipygian vs. the masses" debate. My suggestion would actually reduce the amount of crap that one has to wade through by limiting it all to one thread. If people agree with me, they just vote with their posts.

Any silence from me from this point forward can be interpreted as such as well.
 

shadroch

Well-Known Member
Fair enough, but remember, we didn't start two threads. He did. What would you have? One thread where he's being ripped as a complete phony and the other dedicated to asking him serious questions? Would you want us to treat Doug Grant like that, as well?
 
Top