squeeks said:
Sholudn`t zen give you more of an andvantage over hi-lo since it`s more complex, if not can you recommend another system that would give you more of a advantage?
Opposed to hi-lo, yes. But not because its more complex, its just more efficent.
You can still win with hi-lo, it will just depend on how you use it.
For example,(in MD) a 1-8 spread with hi-lo wongin in and wongin out, would out perform something like Ao2, Hi-opt2 with 1-12 spread
play-all minus the fatigue and variance.
I have CVdata and in the upcoming weeks, Ill be displaying these type of results on the board, as I become more proficient at using the software.
Zen is probably a little stronger for 1&2 deck, while RPC is a little better for 6&8 deck.
Ones a 9 point L2, while RPC is 10 point(L2)
1. 11222100-2-1
2. 12222100-2-2(RPC)
With RPC youll have more cancellations, but will be using more multiples 2 and 4 with a 10% higher running count, opposed to 1 and 3s increments of integers with Zen, but with less cancellations.
Pick your poison.
Wong halves is a little stronger and tougher, than either of these.