kewljason
Well-Known Member
Well, there is nothing unethical about this play. The original player doesn't have enough for the doubledown, so you are taking the doubledown and are entitled to the winnings from such. If it loses, you loses your chips as well. I mean how can it be only a loan if the original player has no way to repay you, in the event of a loss? As with all transactions of this sort, you need to specify the arrangement before hand.tripsix said:I missed the post where Sonny recycled the wheelchair. So I am curious as to how far Sonny and moo321 are in their actions vs perceived ethics?
Sonny, please reply as well.
Say I'm laying down 2 Green chips and catch a 6,5 against a six. I start fumbling around pockets etc. and don't have enough for a double down. (In reality I'd never do this, but for instance.)
So you (Moo/Sonny) graciously loan me 2 green chips to make the double. I/We win. I hand you back 3 greens and 5 reds. How many chips would you hand me back, if any?
The trick comes on a hand where I the player has a 10 or 11 vs dealer 7 or 8 and not enough for a doubledown (a position I would never be in). Player B wants to play the doubledown, but why should I let him without some sort of compensation? I am giving up my oportunity to hit a second time should I draw a small card.