Hey it's vood00 where anything goes lol. In That vain -StandardDeviant said:Show me the mathematical proof that you beat the game of BJ solely based on a betting scheme, and I will buy you dinner at the place of your choosing anywhere on the planet.
All picasso said to me was "I have played Blackjack now for a very long time employing many progressions (mostly the negative progressions) and I have a lifetime profit."
He does not mention how "long" is "long". He does not mention how many individual progression systems he has played for how long within that period of time. Or mention size of roll, etc.
Perhaps not much different than a CC employing many different bet-ramps over many different games with many dif levels of pen over a fixed period of time, maybe even re-sizing at some point or not, and, maybe, still, have a "lifetime" profit.
Can you show a mathematical proof that the fact you happen to be ahead at some point in time is becasue you are a skillful card-counter?
Also, he mentions (I think - was it picasso?) he plays on-line where limits are low and rules so good it's a fantasy world anyway.
I have no idea how long he has played, how he has bet etc. How often he used whatever "progressions".
I have no problem he is still ahead and completely believe him. Voodoo is supposed to win often lol. I'd bet if the guy chose to only flat-bet the min amt from this point forward, it would take a really really long time to "lose" money.
Just rambling for discussion's sake lol.