CRF said:Thanks all, and 3k was just the amount i decided to set aside, that i would be willing to lose. I only mentioned the movie 21, b/c his motive for playing was money for school. The military is gonna pay for some of my schooling, i just think im gonna need a little more for the higher levels, phd, mba, or whatever i end up going for, its not at all the money i need now.
Ive never really thought about poker because even though ive played it growing up, i am horrible at tells, and i dont ever play "the person" i always end up playing the strength of my hand because i cant bluff. Thats probably why i was attracted to blackjack in the first place, because u play against the house who doesnt have options, and will never make a "wild" play and end up getting lucky.
and as far as alot of people trying and failing is that because they stray from the correct betting ramps and made plays based on emotion rather than the math.
I need to go over standard deviation again, but i watched the science of blackjack, and that made it seem like its impossible to lose (in the long run of course), and when i say long run i mean like years of casual play/ months of putting in some serious hours, if you only play when there is a favorable, or at least neutral count.
There are forms of Poker which are more mathematically-oriented, and you can get around some problems by using rngs like stop watches to randomize your play.
Yes, it is essentially impossible to lose "in the long run" if you play properly. But it is also possible to die while trying.