Omega II MP tables

avs21

Well-Known Member
How exact do I want to be with the MP tables? Should I round the numbers by the nearest quarter or by halves? I am side counting 7's and 8's together.
Two MP's I have are 16 vs 10= MP of 1, 15 vs 10= MP .5
 

zengrifter

Banned
By halves is quite sufficient, but you would be better served to use the MPs with HO2 or ZEN. The 9 minus-tag on AO is counter-productive. zg
 

avs21

Well-Known Member
I already have 100 or so indexes memorized for AO, so changing would do some relearning. How much does the 9 minus tag hurt AO? How much better is the PE of HO2 compared to AO. If there is a big difference I will definitely switch.

thank you zg
 
Last edited:

Sonny

Well-Known Member
avs21 said:
I already have 100 or so indexes memorized for AO, so changing would do some relearning. How much does the 9 minus tag hurt AO? How much better is the PE of HO2 compared to AO. If there is a big difference I will definitely switch.
The BC and PE are nearly identical. The biggest thing about counting the 9 is that it throws off your IC quite a bit. The two systems are so similar that you could switch to HO2 and still use the same indices from AO2 without much trouble. And the counting would be a bit easier too! :)

The decision is up to you. I've been meaning to switch from HO2 for years now but I still haven't. It just doesn't make much difference to me at this point.

-Sonny-
 

zengrifter

Banned
SonnyThe two systems are so similar that you could switch to HO2 and still use the same indices from AO2 without much trouble. And the counting would be a bit easier too! [/QUOTE said:
I consider AO2, HO2, and Zen indices interchangeable. zg
 
Top