aslan
Well-Known Member
Well, having higher score, wouldn't that mean that there is lower risk playing two hands than one hand, and therefore, RoR should be reduced? That, coupled with higher variance, leaves me a little perplexed, but maybe my thinking is skewed. Help me out. BTW, wouldn't two hands at a time have the same bankroll requirements as one hand at a time? Trick question. :laugh:blackjack avenger said:The highest SCORE is playing 2 hands all the time. This is for 100 hands played.
Some factors:
The 2nd hand slows the game down, not just your play but dealer payoffs etc.
If you have to bet double table minimum it can be a factor, but for the dealer to even take the time to explain this is a waste for the house.
PS-- Assumption: minimum table limit may be played on both hands.
Last edited: