Yes I have.jay28 said:I wondered if anybody had tried progessive betting or any other voodoo with a game that has no house edge and if so what were the results??
Jay, Do a 4 billion sim on it, to match your food chain...jay28 said:was no HE roulette. Where there is no 0 or 00. I wondered how betting on something like red or black progessively might work out.
Martin Gayle said:There are two only bets in a casino with no HE that I can think of is the Doulbe Up feature on Video Poker terminals and Craps true odds.
It is high card low card vs the dealer while ties push. BS says to do this until you lose or max out. It lessens the house edge on the starting wager. The variance is through the roof.
Another one is the Odds bet in craps. Again, you need to have a bet with a HE to be able to make it. Again variance is high and BS says to take as much free odds you can to offset the HE on the contract bet.
As for a progression...depending on how you use it, it may effect your variance, but in the long run, you will end up in the same spot if you max out your free odds or double up on VP, dead even minus the HE.
Wow. Really? That's beautiful. What's the min-max unit range? I'd love to play it. Any chance this is actually being offered anywhere in the US? Could one move to higher $min table?jay28 said:was no HE roulette. Where there is no 0 or 00. I wondered how betting on something like red or black progessively might work out.
I've only seen this online and not played, so not sure of the unit range.Kasi said:Wow. Really? That's beautiful. What's the min-max unit range? I'd love to play it. Any chance this is actually being offered anywhere in the US? Could one move to higher $min table?
Lots of betting systems would give you a high percentage of achieving the goal of the betting system.
This question has been asked many times before. The problem with combining a progressive system with counting is that you cannot bet enough to maximize gains in proportion to your expected advantage in positive counts using a progressive system like you can card counting with an optimal betting ramp. You are also likely to increase your ROR substantially by employing this technique.RedChipper said:Well, what if you were counting and whenever you were even with the house, say +1, you used a progressive betting system. Say that you would never play a hand at a disadvantage.
Just assume you are using hi-lo and the I18 on a 6 Deck S17, DAS, RSA, NS shoe. Make the table max something reasonable. What do you think of a progressive betting system then?
It's not that big of a deal - just was curious.jay28 said:I've only seen this online and not played, so not sure of the unit range.
https://casino.betfair.com/
Won't matter how you bet in the long-run in a +EV game.RedChipper said:Say that you would never play a hand at a disadvantage. ..
Make the table max something reasonable. What do you think of a progressive betting system then?
Of course. But that says nothing about the probability of winning x units over the next y spins using a progressive system. Progressive systems will increase your probability of winning a little at the expense of losing alot not very often.standard toaster said:The end results will always be equivelant to the house edge..
Probably not. There exist rulesets for Single Deck that have a zero to positive player advantage with perfect play, but good luck finding them actually implemented anywhere.prankster said:Isn't it true that
if you play single deck blackjack using perfect basic strategy you're playing an even game-the house not having an advantage?