Not cheating. Cheating is a felony and I would have to prove the casino actively mispaid me and did so with intent to deprive me of my winnings. Under most gaming authorities they are required to take video and that video must be available for inspection by the authorities, including my attorney. Failure to preserve the tape would result in penalties to the casino much greater than $1000 and probably hurt them in civil court too, where the judge may not only give me my money back but may award multiple damages and legal fees.HockeXpert said:Wouldn't you consider it cheating if the casino took $1k from you on a push and refused to return it? A casino mispay is cheating if it is done intentionally. If there are rogue dealers out there who deal seconds or select the up card, then there are certainly some who mispay drunks and easy prey.
The difference between a player and the casino is a preponderance of evidence. As players, we have no proof whatsoever, other than eye witnesses most of whom are drunk, as to what took place whereas the casino may have video evidence that would supercede any eye witnesses.
Whether or not a casino would bother to try to prosecute would depend on the amount in question and the possible negative implication a lawsuit would have on their business. I certainly never could see MGM-Mirage going after someone for a $50 wager but I could see a sawdust joint trying everything in their power to recover $5,000.
No, it's probably not cheating. It's probably a tort, but it's not cheating. Cheating is when I alter the game in some way.HockeXpert said:Not intending to get overpaid but intentionally keeping what is proven to not legally be yours is cheating.
I am going to rephrase my comment from cheating to stealing. You are correct that this acceptance of a mispay is not cheating. If a dealer was to pay you 5 purple instead of 5 red and you pocket the 5 purple but then the pc comes over and asks you for the purple back because they saw the mispay. If you were to refuse to return the pruple, imho, that is stealing.moo321 said:No, it's probably not cheating. It's probably a tort, but it's not cheating. Cheating is when I alter the game in some way.
It's not going to be theft. It's a civil issue. You would definitely lose if they dragged you to court, and you could be barred and they can legally refuse to cash the chips. It's tortious, but I don't think it's criminal at all.HockeXpert said:I am going to rephrase my comment from cheating to stealing. You are correct that this acceptance of a mispay is not cheating. If a dealer was to pay you 5 purple instead of 5 red and you pocket the 5 purple but then the pc comes over and asks you for the purple back because they saw the mispay. If you were to refuse to return the pruple, imho, that is stealing.
The severity of the act of stealing is proportionate with the amount "stolen". One could potentially be charged with grand theft (I doubt a casino would bother with petty theft). The defense would be possession. Since the recipient of the mispay is in possession of the mispay, it could be argued that possession constitutes rightful ownership and therefore the casino may be SOL but I doubt they would roll out the welcome mat for you if you tried to return.:laugh:
+1automatic monkey said:being morality in the western world is an individual thing, for something to be called immoral it has to be contrary to a moral code that one agreed to follow. I made no promises to the casino thus i don't feel i owe them a mispaid chip. Their goal is to get as much money as possible off their opponents in the game, and i'll do unto them as they do unto us.
At the same time no one is obliged to subscribe to my morality either so if you feel funny about accepting a mispay from a casino, don't. Same as for tipping the dealer- if you feel tipping is the right thing to do, don't let anybody tell you otherwise.there's no -ev like feeling dishonorable about oneself.
Hmm, I don't know about that. The US Constitution appeals to a natural law, as do the main religions of the west (Judaism and Christianity). These all believe in an objective morality that all people know about. See Romans 1-2 in Christianity.Automatic Monkey said:Being morality in the Western world is an individual thing, for something to be called immoral it has to be contrary to a moral code that one agreed to follow.(
I agree that there's a general code all Westerners with normal psychology follow, but the details can vary wildly. Christian and Jewish morality are a little bit different, and which system you use depends on which one you've declared yourself to be. In some moral systems even patronizing a casino is unacceptable. Thus I believe if gaming is OK vs. not OK is a normal variation in the general moral code, so must be little details like what we do with a mispaid chip at the gaming table.moo321 said:Hmm, I don't know about that. The US Constitution appeals to a natural law, as do the main religions of the west (Judaism and Christianity). These all believe in an objective morality that all people know about. See Romans 1-2 in Christianity.
Your moral code may be relativistic, but I'm not sure I can agree that the Western world has accepted moral relativism.
/highjack
So right.Automatic Monkey said:I agree that there's a general code all Westerners with normal psychology follow, but the details can vary wildly. Christian and Jewish morality are a little bit different, and which system you use depends on which one you've declared yourself to be. In some moral systems even patronizing a casino is unacceptable. Thus I believe if gaming is OK vs. not OK is a normal variation in the general moral code, so must be little details like what we do with a mispaid chip at the gaming table.
I had to go back to the OP and, yes, he was not fishing for an ethics answer. I agree, just give it back if asked and it can be proven. I categorize it more as correction of an error, same if the house neglected to pay me for a win and I had to summon the PB. OTOH, I'd prefer that they outlawed "instant replay" for mis-pays, unless caught at the time of the error, and settled before the next deal. After that, all claims should be null and void; i.e., if you snooze, you lose. I wonder where the gaming commissions are on this?sagefr0g said:well, the OP wasn't wanting to get into ethics, sorta thing.
so what's he really fishing for here then? basically his continued solvency as an AP and his ability to keep out of a 'messy' sort of situation, i should think.
just me maybe, i'd say return the miss pay.
ethics, morality, religion, law or whatever just go ahead and pay it back if asked and the miss pay can be proved.
kind of how it says in the wizard of odds ten commandments of gambling:
http://wizardofodds.com/gambling/tencom.html
Thou shalt honor thy gambling debts.
ahh yeah that's a interesting slant on if time has went by sorta thing, cause heck one could have been tapped out totally, no moolaa. what then?aslan said:I had to go back to the OP and, yes, he was not fishing for an ethics answer. I agree, just give it back if asked and it can be proven. I categorize it more as correction of an error, same if the house neglected to pay me for a win and I had to summon the PB. OTOH, I'd prefer that they outlawed "instant replay" for mis-pays, unless caught at the time of the error, and settled before the next deal. After that, all claims should be null and void; i.e., if you snooze, you lose. I wonder where the gaming commissions are on this?
Certainly on the casinos' side in Nevada!aslan said:I wonder where the gaming commissions are on this?
I wouldn't bet against you!HockeXpert said:Certainly on the casinos' side in Nevada!