I am trying to compare the Hi-Opt II Count against the KO Count for English rules (ENHC, 6D, S17, DAS, D9+10+11, 75% Pen) on my SBA 5.5 program.
I am getting extreme results in the difference, which I was not expecting. Using a 1-40 Spread, (I know!!!, no comments plz!)and 16 Indices, leave at -1% advantage, I get -
Hi-Opt II
IB = 1.30%
RoR = 2.70%
Score = 50.07
Knockout
IB = 1.08%
RoR = 10.61%
Score = 25.20
This is basing the spread on the counts advantage, e.g. max bet at about 2.0% at a frequency of 1%. I can't help, but feel I am doing something wrong here. Surely the Hi-Opt II can't be TWICE as good. I expected results to differ from BJA due to British rules, but this can't be right, can it? How can I get the RoR to come down to an acceptable level(5%) for the KO?
If one of you has SBA could you try a few sims to verify.
thxs, I appreciate any input
TRACKER.
(email address, if one wants more info is [email protected])
I am getting extreme results in the difference, which I was not expecting. Using a 1-40 Spread, (I know!!!, no comments plz!)and 16 Indices, leave at -1% advantage, I get -
Hi-Opt II
IB = 1.30%
RoR = 2.70%
Score = 50.07
Knockout
IB = 1.08%
RoR = 10.61%
Score = 25.20
This is basing the spread on the counts advantage, e.g. max bet at about 2.0% at a frequency of 1%. I can't help, but feel I am doing something wrong here. Surely the Hi-Opt II can't be TWICE as good. I expected results to differ from BJA due to British rules, but this can't be right, can it? How can I get the RoR to come down to an acceptable level(5%) for the KO?
If one of you has SBA could you try a few sims to verify.
thxs, I appreciate any input
TRACKER.
(email address, if one wants more info is [email protected])