Automatic Monkey
Banned
Weren't you granted some webspace by a member of the BHOF to post this kind of stuff? Why must you post it on boards that actually have anything to do with blackjack?lvhcm said:
Semyon's seminar
- Thread starter Fire11
- Start date
lvhcm has an opportunity right now to make a useful contribution to the board here:
http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/showthread.php?t=5951
Will he take up the challenge?
http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/showthread.php?t=5951
Will he take up the challenge?
Jumpfreak888
Active Member
Wow, reading lvhcm's posts is aggravating to say the least.
Ken - can't you just ban him from the message boards?
Ken - can't you just ban him from the message boards?
I think Ken's stance on this one is completely fair and even handed. Everyone should be allowed the right to prove their worth and lvhcm has the opportunity.
He's attacked a lot of people that i - and just about everyone else here - considers very credible, he now has the chance to show that he is someone whose opinion should be considered.
RJT.
He's attacked a lot of people that i - and just about everyone else here - considers very credible, he now has the chance to show that he is someone whose opinion should be considered.
RJT.
zengrifter
Banned
Question for Ken: While it may be inappropriate to disclose LVHCM's real identity,
can you identify one or more of his discussion board identities? zg
can you identify one or more of his discussion board identities? zg
zengrifter
Banned
OK, but if he doesn't rise to the challenge, I vote that he be permanently banned. And Stalker too. z:devil:gKenSmith said:
Ps - Someone please post a poll referandum to detirmine if LVHCM should be permanently banned from BJINFO for lack of positive contribution - he illicitly uses A. Curtis's photo and his posts may be reviewed here -
(Dead link: http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/search.php?searchid=139682) _http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/member.php?u=1376_
Last edited:
blackchipjim
Well-Known Member
Two cents
I dunno I think Ken does good job of moderating the site. It is my humble oppinion that he will get rid of himself. This site is not for everyone that plays the game just ones that find it usefull. I say let him find another site to disrupt. blackchipjim
I dunno I think Ken does good job of moderating the site. It is my humble oppinion that he will get rid of himself. This site is not for everyone that plays the game just ones that find it usefull. I say let him find another site to disrupt. blackchipjim
I don't think people should be banned for lack of positive contribution. The only grounds I think someone should be banned is for actually taking away from the forums. By attacking users, bad language, spam, etc.
From all the posts I've seen of LVHCM, they have all been pretty negative. I don't know if they are bad enough to require banning, but that's not my decision.
I just wanted to post to say I don't think someone should get banned because they aren't adding anything of great value to the forum. They should only be banned if they are doing the forum damage.
From all the posts I've seen of LVHCM, they have all been pretty negative. I don't know if they are bad enough to require banning, but that's not my decision.
I just wanted to post to say I don't think someone should get banned because they aren't adding anything of great value to the forum. They should only be banned if they are doing the forum damage.
supercoolmancool
Well-Known Member
I don't think LVHCM should be banned either, but his personal attacks and insults should not be tolerated.
zengrifter
Banned
OK, I'll do it myself. zgzengrifter said: