"The clean-up Table": An aspiring advantage player's first to trips to the casino

Hey guys, I've been reading up on blackjack for a while now and spent quite a lot of time practicing BS and hi-lo counting on my own and on computer programs. I know BS but with some of the rarer plays (double downs and splits) i have to think for a few seconds and recall the chart in my head. I can do the hi-lo count on paper and at my leisure, but i didn't know how i would hold up in the casinos.

First day I go, I'm kind of nervous and jittery. There's only one $10 table, and I had walked in with $120. I knew with that kind of money I shouldn't play any higher limit tables but the $10 table was totally full, so I played the $15 table. Things were really weird! I noticed that a lot of the time the dealer had a stiff hand, he would pull the 4, 5, or 6 out of his ass to make 20 or 21. It was happening almost EVERY time. I went up a little and promptly went down to $30. The most memorable bullshit hand was:
$15 bet, my 8, 8 vs dealer 6
I split, hit for 8, A (stay) and 8, 3 (double) -> 8, 3, 7 for 18 and 19.
Dealer turns over a jack for J, 6.
$45 on the table, I'm thinking, YEAHHHH.
Dealer gets a 5. 21. WHAT THE ****? 90 dollar swing out the window. I would have attributed this to dumb luck, but it seemed like EVERY stiff hand, the dealer would end on 19, 20, or 21.
I go to the $10 table with my last $30, go up a bit but end up walking away with $20. Down $100.


Next day, I go back.

Once again the $10 table is crowded. I told myself to stay away from the $15 table (especially that particular one) but there were many seats available so I sat down and played anyway. I had $160 on me. Repeat of yesterday happened. There was no catastropic hand like yesterday, but it was just steady losing - and dealer (not the same one), once again kept hitting stiff hands and ending up with 19/20/21 almost EVERY time. My friend noticed this too. I lose $100 here in the span of about 5-10 minutes and decide to leave. I just waited for the $10 to open up, eventaully a spot did and I sat down and started playing.

This table was HEAVEN. The dealer was slow, so I had AMPLE time to count. At one point the count was 0 at the beginning of the hand, I lost count, and I actually had the time to recount from the start because she was that slow. She was really friendly too. I bet a few $15 and $20 hands when the count was good - but when the tens and aces came out it seemed everyone but me was getting them (I still won a few big bets though). Some ups and downs, but I eventually walk away up $45, and a happy player. There was a middle aged lady talking a LOT about every hand she got which slowed the game down more, and there was this old lady next to me who kept yelling in cantonese when I would take a card as according to basic strategy that would have made the dealer bust (lmao). Also, the penetration was excellent. At the $15 table, the dealer would shuffle up at about 50%. Here, it was like 75%.

In total, I was down $155; $200 of losses had occured in about 5 minutes flat on two trips to the "clean up table".

My friend had lost $110 at the same $15 table I was on and he noticed as well, that the dealer was getting very "lucky" and pulling the exact small cards he needed, and that the table was almost always nearly empty - 2 or 3 people at a time, and they would quickly get cleaned out.

Now, am I just being paranoid here, or is this kind of thing expected? I just don't see how there could be two tables in the same casino right next to eachother, one of them being so awesome that I could sit there and count cards at a slow leisurely pace and playing a seemingly fair game, while the other table the dealer is dealing as fast as he could and everyone who played there would get cleaned out in 5 minutes and be replaced?

I think I learned a good lesson.. not to be too eager to play. I shouldn't have sat down at the $15 table (because I knew with a little over $100 there was no point, even before I started having suspicions about it). I kept playing when the count was really negative at one point (just because if I wonged out, there WERE NO OTHER $10 tables to play at... and I probably wouldn't be able to get a seat again) and about extra $40 that I should have walked away with.
This is also the only casino that is close enough for me to get to (it's an hour bus ride from my house; half an hour bus ride from my school or work), so I'm stuck with this only having one $10 table that's always being swarmed thing.
 
Last edited:

ihate17

Well-Known Member
before you go further, build a bankroll

a_MASTER_pickup_artist said:
Hey guys, I've been reading up on blackjack for a while now and spent quite a lot of time practicing BS and hi-lo counting on my own and on computer programs. I know BS but with some of the rarer plays (double downs and splits) i have to think for a few seconds and recall the chart in my head. I can do the hi-lo count on paper and at my leisure, but i didn't know how i would hold up in the casinos.

First day I go, I'm kind of nervous and jittery. There's only one $10 table, and I had walked in with $120. I knew with that kind of money I shouldn't play any higher limit tables but the $10 table was totally full, so I played the $15 table. Things were really weird! I noticed that a lot of the time the dealer had a stiff hand, he would pull the 4, 5, or 6 out of his ass to make 20 or 21. It was happening almost EVERY time. I went up a little and promptly went down to $30. The most memorable bullshit hand was:
$15 bet, my 8, 8 vs dealer 6
I split, hit for 8, A (stay) and 8, 3 (double) -> 8, 3, 7 for 18 and 19.
Dealer turns over a jack for J, 6.
$45 on the table, I'm thinking, YEAHHHH.
Dealer gets a 5. 21. WHAT THE ****? 90 dollar swing out the window. I would have attributed this to dumb luck, but it seemed like EVERY stiff hand, the dealer would end on 19, 20, or 21.
I go to the $10 table with my last $30, go up a bit but end up walking away with $20. Down $100.


Next day, I go back.

Once again the $10 table is crowded. I told myself to stay away from the $15 table (especially that particular one) but there were many seats available so I sat down and played anyway. I had $160 on me. Repeat of yesterday happened. There was no catastropic hand like yesterday, but it was just steady losing - and dealer (not the same one), once again kept hitting stiff hands and ending up with 19/20/21 almost EVERY time. My friend noticed this too. I lose $100 here in the span of about 5-10 minutes and decide to leave. I just waited for the $10 to open up, eventaully a spot did and I sat down and started playing.

This table was HEAVEN. The dealer was slow, so I had AMPLE time to count. At one point the count was 0 at the beginning of the hand, I lost count, and I actually had the time to recount from the start because she was that slow. She was really friendly too. I bet a few $15 and $20 hands when the count was good - but when the tens and aces came out it seemed everyone but me was getting them (I still won a few big bets though). Some ups and downs, but I eventually walk away up $45, and a happy player. There was a middle aged lady talking a LOT about every hand she got which slowed the game down more, and there was this old lady next to me who kept yelling in cantonese when I would take a card as according to basic strategy that would have made the dealer bust (lmao). Also, the penetration was excellent. At the $15 table, the dealer would shuffle up at about 50%. Here, it was like 75%.

In total, I was down $155; $200 of losses had occured in about 5 minutes flat on two trips to the "clean up table".

My friend had lost $110 at the same $15 table I was on and he noticed as well, that the dealer was getting very "lucky" and pulling the exact small cards he needed, and that the table was almost always nearly empty - 2 or 3 people at a time, and they would quickly get cleaned out.

Now, am I just being paranoid here, or is this kind of thing expected? I just don't see how there could be two tables in the same casino right next to eachother, one of them being so awesome that I could sit there and count cards at a slow leisurely pace and playing a seemingly fair game, while the other table the dealer is dealing as fast as he could and everyone who played there would get cleaned out in 5 minutes and be replaced?

I think I learned a good lesson.. not to be too eager to play. I shouldn't have sat down at the $15 table (because I knew with a little over $100 there was no point, even before I started having suspicions about it). I kept playing when the count was really negative at one point (just because if I wonged out, there WERE NO OTHER $10 tables to play at... and I probably wouldn't be able to get a seat again) and about extra $40 that I should have walked away with.
This is also the only casino that is close enough for me to get to (it's an hour bus ride from my house; half an hour bus ride from my school or work), so I'm stuck with this only having one $10 table that's always being swarmed thing.
The first thing that hit my mind was not the dealer pulling out hands, because once you play long enough those periods of time will not surprise you because unlike you, the dealer has to hit everyone of his stiff hands. No, your spread was what hit me first. If you are spreading from $10-$20, you will not make any money, especially if playing all and not wonging in. Learn BS, learn to count, do it all perfectly and you are still going to lose more hands than you win! In order to make money you must really up your bets depending on how much of an advantage you have for the upcoming hand. If you are playing a 6 deck shoe and can not constantly wong the tables because of crowds, then you need to be betting from $10-about $120.
This can not be done while bringing $160 with you.

As far as the dealer on one table killing the players and on the next table the players killing the casino, you must understand that at any moment that can change, reverse itself or stay the same. Dealers must hit every stiff hand and that makes it appear that they make hands at a greater percentage than players do. Also, because of the rules that they hit by, they will tend to get into streaks of busting or making hands, at least in our minds.
We also suffer from selective memory. Have a 20 vs a dealer 16 and the dealer busts, you really do forget this. You remember that you won but you do not care if the dealer had 19 or 26. But have a 20 vs a dealer 16 and the dealer pulls a 5, it hits you in the gut and sticks with you. Let him do it several times and new players think the dealer is a magician, cheat or something else.

ihate17
 
ha ha yeah i knew it wasn't a good idea to do this with so little money but i just wanted to practice in a real casino and expected to about break even.

i don't have much money but i'm a student living with my parents so pretty much all of my income is disposable. i will milk online casino bonuses and whatnot for a while (which i suppose will help drill BS into my head) to build up a bankroll.

wouldn't i get some heat though if i suddenly bet $120 on a table where everyone is betting $10 most of the time?
 

EasyRhino

Well-Known Member
Yeah, it's to be expected. Basically all of it.

The high-roller table was empty for two reasons: 1) the dealer doesn't sound and friendly, and 2) he kept winning. People will flee from tables where they're getting killed, and move towards tables where people seem to be winning and/or having fun.

As for the BS, having to pause a sec for the tricky hands is okay, but are you sure you're making the right plays? It's really important to get that nailed. Its going to make a bigger difference in your current play then your counting and betting

... Which brings us to the most important point. I just want to make sure you know[/i] that a 2x spread in basically any game is not a money-winning proposition. In fact, it won't even make much of a dent in the house edge. If you're just going in to practice, or to have a good time, then knock yourself out. But you really shouldn't think you have an advantage. If you're playing a shoe game, shoot for a 12x spread or higher.

There is one way you could play the game and give yourself half a shot with your limited bankroll, and that's to backcount like a fiend. If you avoid the negative counts, then swoop in with $10-$15 bets (that's right, your "big" bets are $10-$15) only during positive counts, then you could have an expected profit. Maybe a buck or two an hour!
 
ha ha ok new question

ONLINE LIVE DEALER GAMES!

i am playing one right now and it seems like a GOLD MINE.
it is slow as hell and i can count at my leisure, and i can be blatantly doing it because there is no camera watching me. and i'm playing with a $400 bankroll of which only $200 is mine thanks to bonuses.

there must be something wrong working against me that i'm not seeing here, right?

edit: she burned 8 cards on the start of a new shoe and is burning 1 card every round. damn.
 
Last edited:

Dog Hand

Well-Known Member
a_MASTER_pickup_artist said:
wouldn't i get some heat though if i suddenly bet $120 on a table where everyone is betting $10 most of the time?
No, you almost certainly won't.

Several years ago, when I was just starting out, I spent many, many hours spreading $10-$120 on a DD table. I'd plop myself down and play for HOURS: I mean 4-5 hour sessions were nothing unusual for me.

Yes, I did eventually get backed off there, but not before my max bet grew to about double the original and I got in well over 100 hours of playing time. I'm pretty sure I could have gone on more-or-less forever playing $10-$120 there.

You have to spread if you want to play a +EV game.

Hope this helps!

Dog Hand
 

EasyRhino

Well-Known Member
It does kind of depend on the joint. I got backed off at one low-rolling local place after I was betting around $100-$200 at a table where everyone else was betting $5. That was a lot of money for that place, though.
 

glovesetc

Well-Known Member
build the BR big time

never go in with short money - it is a recipe for disaster big time !!!:) :grin: ;) :cool2:
 

Diver

Well-Known Member
I've been wondering about that

EasyRhino said:
It does kind of depend on the joint. I got backed off at one low-rolling local place after I was betting around $100-$200 at a table where everyone else was betting $5. That was a lot of money for that place, though.
Right now, I'm spreading $15-125 at DD games with anywhere from $10-200 to $15-500 limits. I seldom adjust my bet more than one unit at a time, playing what looks like a progression as appropriate to get close to what the count calls for. At one of the casinos with a larger limit, even two green chips will elicit a "green action" call but it seems routine and not followed by more than fleeting attention, if that, from the pb. My bankroll is steadily increasing to the point that I can envision upping my spread in the near future. I'm guessing that will be problematic at the lower limit tables but not so much at the $500 max table if my max bet is only $200. Does that sound right? Also, the only times I've had losing sessions was due to time constraints; otherwise I've been able to come back from downswings before heading out. But if you're walking away up $200-$600 with any regularity from the smaller limit places, is that tolerable to management for long?
 

ihate17

Well-Known Member
spread and heat

Basically, what everyone is saying here is that you need to know something about the heat level or tolerance level in the place you are playing. Some places (sweat shops) have been known to toss a guy on double deck spreading from $5-$40, while another place will have a double deck player spreading $50-$400 for hours with no heat.

Understanding the place can sometimes happen with just watching some of their non counting, steaming players. In California, I see many players on $10 tables sometimes bet the table minimum and sometimes steaming or parlaying (but not counting) bet table maxes of $500 or $1000.

Often, I will play double deck with $50-$500 spread on a $10 table. Count is negative but it is close to a shuffle, I might throw out $10 bets till the shuffle. Sometimes I might, in a great count on last hand, throw 2 bets of $500 out, so in the extreme, I might be going from 1 bet of $10- 2 bets of $500. Will I ever get backed off in these places, perhaps but I have played short sessions in many of them for years.

ihate17
 
well it is a nice casino attached to a nice hotel so i don't think i would get heat.. i just talked to my friend and he spreads $25-$250 there and he said no one has ever said anything to him (lac leamy in hull, quebec) .. but it's the ONLY casino in my city (technically it's not in my city, but i can take a bus there from ottawa). thus, i don't want to get banned from there.
 

aslan

Well-Known Member
ihate17 said:
Basically, what everyone is saying here is that you need to know something about the heat level or tolerance level in the place you are playing. Some places (sweat shops) have been known to toss a guy on double deck spreading from $5-$40, while another place will have a double deck player spreading $50-$400 for hours with no heat.

Understanding the place can sometimes happen with just watching some of their non counting, steaming players. In California, I see many players on $10 tables sometimes bet the table minimum and sometimes steaming or parlaying (but not counting) bet table maxes of $500 or $1000.

Often, I will play double deck with $50-$500 spread on a $10 table. Count is negative but it is close to a shuffle, I might throw out $10 bets till the shuffle. Sometimes I might, in a great count on last hand, throw 2 bets of $500 out, so in the extreme, I might be going from 1 bet of $10- 2 bets of $500. Will I ever get backed off in these places, perhaps but I have played short sessions in many of them for years.

ihate17
Now I know what a "sweat shop" is. I played at The Orleans and did pretty well. I think it was DD. Someone commented that I was lucky because it is a real "sweat shop." At DD I spread 1x4. No heat that I could see. But I didn't play more than an hour or two.
 

zengrifter

Banned
aslan said:
At DD I spread 1x4. No heat that I could see. But I didn't play more than an hour or two.
That is NOT a sufficient/winning spread for an inferior Coast Casinos 2D game (50%?). zg
 

ihate17

Well-Known Member
You were no threat

aslan said:
Now I know what a "sweat shop" is. I played at The Orleans and did pretty well. I think it was DD. Someone commented that I was lucky because it is a real "sweat shop." At DD I spread 1x4. No heat that I could see. But I didn't play more than an hour or two.
Sure you could have had a great run and ran into a paranoid
Coast pit but in fact a 1-4 spread in that game is just what ZG described it as. You do need to spread more agressively to make money.

ihate17
 

aslan

Well-Known Member
ihate17 said:
Sure you could have had a great run and ran into a paranoid
Coast pit but in fact a 1-4 spread in that game is just what ZG described it as. You do need to spread more agressively to make money.

ihate17
What's the appropriate spread? 1x8 or even as high as 1x16? I probably would get backed off at 1x8, but 1x16 is totally unrealistic, right?
 
Last edited:

ihate17

Well-Known Member
What the books say

aslan said:
What's the appropriate spread?
Most blackjack books say spread 8-1 on double deck, but when they are cutting 50% you should be more like 10-1.

Generally, I will not play a 50% pen game but you will find opportunities for wild spreads sometimes, especially if you have a good act and some big players on your table.

ihate17
 

aslan

Well-Known Member
ihate17 said:
Most blackjack books say spread 8-1 on double deck, but when they are cutting 50% you should be more like 10-1.

Generally, I will not play a 50% pen game but you will find opportunities for wild spreads sometimes, especially if you have a good act and some big players on your table.

ihate17
As I recall, I was getting 60% or nearly 60% pen. That might in part explain my good luck. Standard deviation would explain the rest. Good thing I left early.
 
I just like to lurk around this site and learn from all you masters. But I disagree with going in the a small bankroll. I know i will never make the thousands some of you guys make, but my best is (I have repeated it several times) going to a table with 40-50 dollars and walking away with 500. Last night I took 40 and rolled it into 250. I tried the progression method just cause I heard you all guys discuss with such fervor. But know that you all help us small pot players:grin: !

Bigjimswoman
 

rollem411

Well-Known Member
a_MASTER_pickup_artist said:
well it is a nice casino attached to a nice hotel so i don't think i would get heat.. i just talked to my friend and he spreads $25-$250 there and he said no one has ever said anything to him (lac leamy in hull, quebec) .. but it's the ONLY casino in my city (technically it's not in my city, but i can take a bus there from ottawa). thus, i don't want to get banned from there.
If your worried about getting banned from the only casino in your area, you should make your sessions quick when you find yourself ahead by a lot of money. There are plenty of ways to disguise your bets as well so you dont look like a counter. I've read about some really interesting ideas..ill try to find a link to the site I was at asap.
 
well i got my ass royally pounded AGAIN.
lost 200 bucks.
"went to the bathroom" on a negative shoe and came back on the shuffle. this shoe went highly positive so i spread all the way up to (gasp) 25$ from my initial bet of 10$. i had another "hand of ruin" in almost the exact same fashion as last time:

8, 8 vs dealer 2
split
8, 10, stand
8, 2, double down, 8, stand
2 hands of 18
dealer makes a 20 out of like 5 small cards and i have 75$ on the table :(. there goes everything.

oook lesson learned, keep saving up and whoring online casino bonuses and don't set foot in a real casino until i have at least $2000 built up... taking online bonus whoring into account and my real-life casino losses im still up about 150$ :p


on a side note there was a guy playing who was DEFINETLY counting. he was on the 10$ table and betting as high as 250$, and 50$ off a fresh shoe. i'm assuming he went as low as 10$ on a low count since he was on the 10$ table.
 
Top