Actually, it wasn't the Christians who started the backlash, rather it stems from the suffrigist/temperance movement of the latter 19th century, when we begin to see an outcry over two of the 3 most popular forms of entertainment for 19th century Americans-cards and dancing. (The third, BTW, was singing. (My work has led me into a lot of research on the history of both cards and gaming in this country). Oddly enough, they were NOT connected with the beliefs of the church, rather the problems associated with drinking and taverns. Unfortunately, most of this movement also coinsided with the 2nd Reformation, where a number of the more Fundamentalist churches sprang (split) from the Presbyterians. This caused a specific cultures within the churches themselves to arise, a difference of where the "Absolute Law of God" was injected with the "Moralistic Law (view) of Man".
And yes, both sides of the coin can be argued convincingly-that a 'moral' Christian can-with an understanding of himself and his limits-play cards, dance, even have a beer-where the argument can ALSO be made that a 'moral' Christian could NEVER be a part of the two and never have to search for an understanding of himself and his limits. (Kinda like the easy way-studying to be a perfect BS player, and a perfect BS player who studies to be a perfect BS AP player. Both have their merits). It has to do with a definition of 'good' and 'evil' which is better suited to a theological forum.
And I didn't vote for gaming in Ohio not because of my pro-religious beliefs, rather because of my anti-government beliefs.:whip:
Remember what Winston Churchill said: "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for everything else!"