psyduck
Well-Known Member
My current play style is back counting ASM shoes. As a result most of my plays are in high counts. I still experience losing hand after hand. One of the reasons is sometimes the high cards were behind the cut card. Shuffle tracking should be able to locate the high cards, an obvious advantge over counting alone.Gamblor said:Well, definitely not an expert ST'er or anything, so take what I say for what its worth (I more ST in addition to CC'ing) - but in a sense the short term variance is greater since I'm making bigger bets more often then I would straight up CC'ing. ST'ing ain't no license to print money either, the % advantages you get with it are similar to CC'ing. You can get sh*t as 13's and 14's while the dealer and everyone else get the 10's and Aces just like counting :sad:
I would imagine for HC'ing, a game with a 3% advantage has a lot of variance too (not totally uncommon to get around a 2-3% advantage with CC'ing at times, which is when your making your huge bets). Now a 10% advantage, that might be such a huge advantage that the variance is noticeably less?
Unfortunately my local casino only has a hand shuffled 2 deck game and the shuffle procedure is untrackable (I am very sure of this).