Wonging In vs. Out

[avs21]

Hey AVS, that's great. Is the first player wonging out at +2 or at -1? The former seems unrealistic. Also, might you have switched the order? The +2 player should have better score.

Could you sim the same thing with a 1-12 spread, possibly with LS?

Thanks!

How'd you do it, anyway?

The first one is wonging in at +2 then wonging out at -1. Second one is starting from the begining of shoe and wonging out at -1. Sorry I mixed up the scores

I used CV data it wouldn't allow for the second player to wong out at -1 unless I had the player wonging in also. Since you were starting at beginning of shoe with 0 count. I made it, so the second player would enter play once it reached 0.

How steep do you want your bet ramp?

 

[schismist]

How about optimal with 5% RoR in each case?

Wow, thanks again.

 

[avs21]

5-60 spread S17 LS DAS using hi-lo I-18

Wong in at +2
TBA:1.936
IBA: 2.260
Win rate: 6.69

Starting at beginning of shoe
TBA: 1.167
IBA:1.346
Win rate $5.70


I wasn't able to do the ROR without knowing how big your bankroll is.

 

[sagefr0g]

Senor Frog let me know next time you will be in Cinci. The $25 Argosy DD game allows mid-shoe entry, leaving it vulnerable despite the crummy 50% penetration. I saw a guy sit there and jump in and out liberally with large bets, but I think he was just a plopper.

While the above game is double 9-11 only and no DAS, it is also S17, helping to offset some of the lost EV.

will do but it'll probably be quite a while. sounds interesting though.