Here are all the comments posted on the site, with the most recent discussions listed first.
To participate in any of these discussions, you can reply on the article page.
Once the current version of the trainer is loaded and running, it runs locally on your machine. Something has to be causing Flash to run slowly on your machine.
Note that this will work completely differently in the eventual new version, which will be interacting with the server to provide additional features.
I think there are some flaws in your basic strategy regarding early surrender. The game recommended I surrender with 12 vs a dealer ace. That isn’t right, is it? It also recommended I surrender with a 7 vs an ace. That can’t possibly be right!
Yes, those are correct plays for “Early” surrender, where you can surrender before the dealer checks for blackjack.
But you probably don’t want to choose that rule. It’s rare.
Choose Late Surrender and you’ll get the advice you expect.
To learn more, see my article Blackjack Surrender Explained.
In the above drill, “Basic Strategy Drill exercise” You have made up STARTING hands and given the dealers up card. If these are meant to be starting hands, what is the idea behind some of the Three figured player hands?
Good point. I suspect the GameMaster wrote that line and later created the exercise. Regardless, I have edited the description of the exercise to remove the “starting” part of the description. Thanks! The 3-card exercises are of course to be treated just like the others. Make sure you know the correct basic strategy for the 3-card hands.
I’ve noticed that some advantage players hit on A+7 when the dealer has a 2 whereas your strategy here indicates that stand/stay would be the preferred choice with 8 decks, DAS, No surrender, and no peek. Any thoughts on this difference?
It is likely that you saw players doubling A7v2, not just hitting it. (Hitting would simply be a mistake, as it is the third best way to play the hand.)
The choice of whether to stand or double with A7v2 is a close one.
In fact, correct basic strategy for that hand depends on whether the dealer hits or stands on soft 17s.
(The moteur stratégique takes all this into account when creating an accurate strategy chart for you.)
In S17 games, you should stand.
In H17 games, you should double. (Except in single deck.)
Card counters will often double this hand even in S17 games, because it only takes a true count of +1 or more to make this the correct play.
I’m going to be playing at a casino next week with No surrender, 8 decks, S17, and no peek. Got a couple of questions about strategy in such a situation;
1)Do I DD with a hard 11 on dealer’s 10 or hit?
2)Do I split 8s on dealers 10-A or hit?
3)Do I stand with a soft A/7 on dealer’s 2?
4) Do I split A/A on dealer’s A or hit?
Appreciate your help and any rationale you can provide for choices in these situations given the conditions of the table at which I shall be trying my luck. Thanks..
To answer your questions:
1) Hit 11vT
2) Hit 88vT and 88vA.
3) Stand with A7v2.
4) Hit AAvA.
Just to be clear, these strategies are for a “no peek” game, where the dealer either does not deal a hole card, or does not check it for a blackjack, and all player bets are vulnerable if the dealer ends up with a blackjack. In the US, that’s almost never the case, but it is common outside the US.
The answers to 2 and 4 would change with peek, right? Split on A/A and 8/8 with dealer’s A. And I do understand how vulnerable all players are with European style no peek. If I notice anything interesting or advantageous, I’ll post here.
Hi,i have been playing in Macau and according to some website the house edge there is only about -0.09%(with proper basic stratergy),1/6 penertration.I was wondering if the game is beatable with large enough bet spread since the house edge is so low…thx!
Almost any game is beatable with a large enough spread. Is it beatable in practice? You would really need to sim this and see what kind of spread it would take. I assume by “1/6”, you mean they are dealing only one deck of out six before shuffling (or before putting the discards into a continuous shuffle machine). That’s a tough game, and even if it is beatable with a huge spread, there should be better opportunities for you elsewhere.
Je suis un étudiant en master qui étudie l'ingénierie aux Pays-Bas, et je suis également un joueur de stratégie de base. C'est dommage que les casinos néerlandais aient déjà introduit le CSM.
J'ai continué à perdre pendant 3 jours, en fait perdre de l'argent n'est pas la pire chose qui me dérange, parce que je suis convaincu qu'à long terme, les mathématiques sont en ma faveur. Ce qui me rend vraiment triste, c'est qu'un homme comme moi n'est pas le bienvenu au casino. Bien sûr, les croupiers essaient toujours de me débarrasser de la table, et les pigeons m'imputent toujours leurs pertes. Par exemple, j'ai obtenu un 16 et le croupier montre un 10, je frappe, j'obtiens un 2, puis le croupier obtient un 10 (le croupier ne prend qu'une seule carte au premier tour, ce qui signifie que si je ne frappe pas, le croupier pourrait perdre). Lorsque cette situation se produit, tous les autres joueurs se mettent en colère et essaient de m'apprendre à jouer. Il est évident que moi et ces idiots vivons dans un monde différent, ce qui signifie que je n'ai pas besoin d'expliquer quoi que ce soit car ils ne savent même pas ce qu'est l'avantage de la maison. Et si parfois je n'ai pas de chance et que ces idiots gagnent de l'argent par leurs mauvaises méthodes, ils peuvent être encore plus arrogants et se mettre en avant. C'est le moment le plus sombre pour moi, car ils me donneront un exemple stupide. Les pigeons pensent que les joueurs de BS sont des pigeons et les blâment, quel monde !!!
Thanks a lot for your very logic and understandable explanation. If you help me to find any chart that shows the percentages of win, push, or lose of “all deferent possibilities” after dealt two cards for player, exactly base on basic strategy, either stay, hit, double or split (the same as your chart, but not just for doubling down), I really appreciate it.
That paragraph is talking about a common exception to the earlier advice. The idea is that if you lose $350 of your $400 bank, the remaining $50 is probably not enough to mount a comeback in the remaining hands. In this case, go all-in instead.
As for holding a small amount back in case everyone else loses all their chips on the final hand, that is a useful plan in some cases, and it can be a reason to hold back a seemingly useless amount. However, that tactic works a lot less frequently these days as players have become more experienced. If someone sees you milking a tiny bankroll hoping to make it to the final hand, they’ll usually make sure they lock you out by not going all-in at the end.
The game has been slow and jerky the last few days. I have a very fast internet connection so I know the problem must be at your end.
Once the current version of the trainer is loaded and running, it runs locally on your machine. Something has to be causing Flash to run slowly on your machine.
Note that this will work completely differently in the eventual new version, which will be interacting with the server to provide additional features.
I think there are some flaws in your basic strategy regarding early surrender. The game recommended I surrender with 12 vs a dealer ace. That isn’t right, is it? It also recommended I surrender with a 7 vs an ace. That can’t possibly be right!
Yes, those are correct plays for “Early” surrender, where you can surrender before the dealer checks for blackjack.
But you probably don’t want to choose that rule. It’s rare.
Choose Late Surrender and you’ll get the advice you expect.
To learn more, see my article Blackjack Surrender Explained.
OK, thanks! I admit I didn’t know the difference between early and late surrender. Thanks for explaining!
No worries. It can be confusing! The next version of the trainer will make more information available about the rule choices.
In the above drill, “Basic Strategy Drill exercise” You have made up STARTING hands and given the dealers up card. If these are meant to be starting hands, what is the idea behind some of the Three figured player hands?
Good point. I suspect the GameMaster wrote that line and later created the exercise. Regardless, I have edited the description of the exercise to remove the “starting” part of the description. Thanks! The 3-card exercises are of course to be treated just like the others. Make sure you know the correct basic strategy for the 3-card hands.
I’ve noticed that some advantage players hit on A+7 when the dealer has a 2 whereas your strategy here indicates that stand/stay would be the preferred choice with 8 decks, DAS, No surrender, and no peek. Any thoughts on this difference?
It is likely that you saw players doubling A7v2, not just hitting it. (Hitting would simply be a mistake, as it is the third best way to play the hand.)
The choice of whether to stand or double with A7v2 is a close one.
In fact, correct basic strategy for that hand depends on whether the dealer hits or stands on soft 17s.
(The moteur stratégique takes all this into account when creating an accurate strategy chart for you.)
In S17 games, you should stand.
In H17 games, you should double. (Except in single deck.)
Card counters will often double this hand even in S17 games, because it only takes a true count of +1 or more to make this the correct play.
I’m going to be playing at a casino next week with No surrender, 8 decks, S17, and no peek. Got a couple of questions about strategy in such a situation;
1)Do I DD with a hard 11 on dealer’s 10 or hit?
2)Do I split 8s on dealers 10-A or hit?
3)Do I stand with a soft A/7 on dealer’s 2?
4) Do I split A/A on dealer’s A or hit?
Appreciate your help and any rationale you can provide for choices in these situations given the conditions of the table at which I shall be trying my luck. Thanks..
“No peek” does impact the decisions that you asked about.
You can get a complete strategy chart for this exact game here:
https://www.blackjackinfo.com/blackjack-basic-strategy-engine/?numdecks=8&soft17=s17&dbl=all&das=yes&surr=ns&peek=no
To answer your questions:
1) Hit 11vT
2) Hit 88vT and 88vA.
3) Stand with A7v2.
4) Hit AAvA.
Just to be clear, these strategies are for a “no peek” game, where the dealer either does not deal a hole card, or does not check it for a blackjack, and all player bets are vulnerable if the dealer ends up with a blackjack. In the US, that’s almost never the case, but it is common outside the US.
The answers to 2 and 4 would change with peek, right? Split on A/A and 8/8 with dealer’s A. And I do understand how vulnerable all players are with European style no peek. If I notice anything interesting or advantageous, I’ll post here.
Correct. Answers 2 and 4 change with peek. Here’s the chart:
https://www.blackjackinfo.com/blackjack-basic-strategy-engine/?numdecks=8&soft17=s17&dbl=all&das=yes&surr=ns&peek=yes
Very helpful. Many thanks.
Hi,i have been playing in Macau and according to some website the house edge there is only about -0.09%(with proper basic stratergy),1/6 penertration.I was wondering if the game is beatable with large enough bet spread since the house edge is so low…thx!
Almost any game is beatable with a large enough spread. Is it beatable in practice? You would really need to sim this and see what kind of spread it would take. I assume by “1/6”, you mean they are dealing only one deck of out six before shuffling (or before putting the discards into a continuous shuffle machine). That’s a tough game, and even if it is beatable with a huge spread, there should be better opportunities for you elsewhere.
Cher Ken,
Je suis un étudiant en master qui étudie l'ingénierie aux Pays-Bas, et je suis également un joueur de stratégie de base. C'est dommage que les casinos néerlandais aient déjà introduit le CSM.
J'ai continué à perdre pendant 3 jours, en fait perdre de l'argent n'est pas la pire chose qui me dérange, parce que je suis convaincu qu'à long terme, les mathématiques sont en ma faveur. Ce qui me rend vraiment triste, c'est qu'un homme comme moi n'est pas le bienvenu au casino. Bien sûr, les croupiers essaient toujours de me débarrasser de la table, et les pigeons m'imputent toujours leurs pertes. Par exemple, j'ai obtenu un 16 et le croupier montre un 10, je frappe, j'obtiens un 2, puis le croupier obtient un 10 (le croupier ne prend qu'une seule carte au premier tour, ce qui signifie que si je ne frappe pas, le croupier pourrait perdre). Lorsque cette situation se produit, tous les autres joueurs se mettent en colère et essaient de m'apprendre à jouer. Il est évident que moi et ces idiots vivons dans un monde différent, ce qui signifie que je n'ai pas besoin d'expliquer quoi que ce soit car ils ne savent même pas ce qu'est l'avantage de la maison. Et si parfois je n'ai pas de chance et que ces idiots gagnent de l'argent par leurs mauvaises méthodes, ils peuvent être encore plus arrogants et se mettre en avant. C'est le moment le plus sombre pour moi, car ils me donneront un exemple stupide. Les pigeons pensent que les joueurs de BS sont des pigeons et les blâment, quel monde !!!
Voir aussi,
ZHANG
Thanks a lot for your very logic and understandable explanation. If you help me to find any chart that shows the percentages of win, push, or lose of “all deferent possibilities” after dealt two cards for player, exactly base on basic strategy, either stay, hit, double or split (the same as your chart, but not just for doubling down), I really appreciate it.
thanks again
make
That paragraph is talking about a common exception to the earlier advice. The idea is that if you lose $350 of your $400 bank, the remaining $50 is probably not enough to mount a comeback in the remaining hands. In this case, go all-in instead.
As for holding a small amount back in case everyone else loses all their chips on the final hand, that is a useful plan in some cases, and it can be a reason to hold back a seemingly useless amount. However, that tactic works a lot less frequently these days as players have become more experienced. If someone sees you milking a tiny bankroll hoping to make it to the final hand, they’ll usually make sure they lock you out by not going all-in at the end.