Ecco tutti i commenti pubblicati sul sito, con le discussioni più recenti elencate per prime.
Per partecipare a una qualsiasi di queste discussioni, potete rispondere nella pagina dell'articolo.
Before any serious play, your play should be 100% — it’s not that difficult. If you are still making strategy errors, it’s too soon to play in a casino.
Your penetration hopes are wholly unrealistic. I noticed your basic strategy game puts the cutcard 35 cards before the end. That’s unrealistic. The casinos put it either at the halfway point or near it. Putting it 1/2 deck away from the end DOES NOT HAPPEN. Frankly I think you should be able to set the point where it shuffles in that game, I don’t want it to play to 35 every time and it should let me choose where it is if it is to be a simulator that operates on the parameters I set to simulate actual conditions. You are also unrealistic to expect heat after 1 mere hour. I’ve played for hours and hours and left the casinos with so many half-dollars from blackjacks that my pants were falling down (I would bet an odd $ amount every time if the min bet was odd already, so that I could track the # of blackjacks I have by the # of half dollars I have, this would also give me an idea of the # of hands I played total). Also, don’t leave when the count goes negative. Just bet the minimum bet. You’re stealing from the other players, not the house, if you leave them when it’s negative or stand back and look over their shoulders and sit down when the count goes highly positive. I’m not there to steal from the other players.
I think most of this is your own superstitions. First of all, I take insurance on the min bet all the time in 2-deck games…. because the count can change as a result of the current hand being dealt out. Remember I decided on my bet amount before any cards were dealt out that hand. I decide if I want insurance after seeing the dealer’s ace, my 2 cards, and all the other players’. I may have bet the minimum because the truecount was only 1, and then suddenly when the hand is dealt, it’s 3 and the dealer shows an ace and guess what, I’d be taking insurance anyway. In other words there’s a disconnect between the count when you determine the bet size and when you make your decisions.
To see how superstitious you are being, allow me to put 2 inconsistent things you said side by side, and I think it will be obvious:
1. a ‘fanny pack’ has got to be one of the most disarming items a counter can wear. With that and a pair of glasses on, damn few supervisors will ever think you’re this cold-blooded, card counting, steely-eyed destroyer of casinos
2. Dress appropriately for your betting level. A ‘high-roller’ should look like a prosperous person not, as one author put it, “like an out-of-work substitute school teacher.”
For you to actually believe both of these are sound pieces of advice without seeing the contradiction, requires some irrationality on your part. You are simply projecting thoughts and motivations onto the security personnel, you’re SUPPOSING that’s the way they see it. But that is magical thinking… to think the way you see it is the way others see it and that it affects reality. Magical thinking has no place in a logical strategy in this game.
Also I hesitate on stiff hands all the time. Just because I’m an advantage player, doesn’t mean I’m not dreading the consequences of my decisions every step of the way, and often thinking heavily on whether the count is above or below a threshold for doing one thing or another, there’s another reason to hesitate.
Honestly, the “deviations” to basic strategy are all you need to alleviate their suspicions most of the time. One time I was banned was after playing all day long for many many days. According to my casino log, on October 2, 7,10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 24 and 27 of one year. All at the same casino. Most of them many hours in a row. I was “trespassed” when I walked in on October 29. The other time, was when I…. stepped out too many times for negative counts. You don’t want to hear it, I’m sure, but that’s the surest way to get their attention…. to walk out on a shoe when the count goes negative instead of playing through. It’s a bad practice anyway since what you’re really doing is taking money from the other players at the table, not the house, since the only money you’re saving is the bets of the minimum bet size, and they will have to play more hands with your absence to get through the same number of cards. That was when I decided to stop doing that…. I decided later it was actually unethical to do it as well.
È buffo. Non mi preoccupo di valutarle in coppia, le faccio una alla volta o eventualmente più di due alla volta, se è la prima volta che ho accesso a quell'informazione, ad esempio se stavo guardando da un'altra parte o se ero distratto o se si tratta di una carta a faccia in giù e un mazzo è rovesciato. Dal mio punto di vista, il dealer più veloce è praticamente un ghiacciaio. Non ha senso prendere in considerazione l'idea di contarle 2 alla volta quando alla fine ne distribuisce ancora una alla volta e quando dopo ognuna di esse ho tutto il tempo prima che riveli la successiva. In definitiva, il modo di dire è sbagliato. L'occhio è più veloce della mano. Ho il tempo di osservare ogni minimo movimento della mano del mazziere, effettivamente al rallentatore rispetto alla mia velocità di percezione, mentre fa scivolare una carta dalla scarpa e la spinge verso la prima base, la gira per scoprirla, poi prende la seconda, e poi prende la successiva per darla alla seconda base. Quando ha girato la seconda carta, la prima è già nella mia somma di corsa. Non dovrebbe essere difficile farlo. Non c'è spazio per guardarle due alla volta. Ma anche se non le vedete una alla volta, non dovrebbe essere difficile vederne 4 o 5 alla volta e conoscere il numero di carte basse meno il numero di carte alte in quel piccolo insieme, per esempio vedere un gruppo di 5 carte, vedere che sono 4 carte basse e un 8, e aggiungere semplicemente 4 alla mia somma corrente. Sono così veloce? In base alle partite di scacchi blitz online, non credo che la mia velocità sia particolarmente speciale.
No it isn’t. Not even close. You need a bankroll of like 500 times the min bet to have a risk of ruin of 50%. So if the min bet is 50, you would need 25 thousand dollars. To have a risk of ruin of 50%. A bankroll of 50 thousand dollars gives a risk of ruin of 25%. A bankroll of 100 thousand dollars gives a risk of ruin of 6.25%. I’d say, if there’s a table with a min bet of 50, RUN IN THE OTHER DIRECTION!
and your stupid to bet more than 50 dollars of hard earned money too. Blackjack should be fun,not ruined by high stake gamblers like you.6 to 5 blackjack is unacceptable,and anybody that plays blackjack that has a clue would make a stand against these casinos ruing players odds by making 6 to 6 blackjack.whether its 1 dollar minimum,or 1000 dollar minimum,blackjack should allways payout 3 to 2.
I prodotti Apple, essendo non standard, presentano problemi quando si utilizza il software normale, quindi non è possibile affermare in modo definitivo che qualsiasi software normale funzionerà correttamente su qualsiasi prodotto Apple. Mi dispiace, vorrei che ci fosse una risposta migliore.
In blackjack trainer obviously the perfect % is 100 but what percentage is acceptable for good play ???
Before any serious play, your play should be 100% — it’s not that difficult. If you are still making strategy errors, it’s too soon to play in a casino.
the game get stuk when i have 40k
Get over yourself, someone else can answer the question then
Your penetration hopes are wholly unrealistic. I noticed your basic strategy game puts the cutcard 35 cards before the end. That’s unrealistic. The casinos put it either at the halfway point or near it. Putting it 1/2 deck away from the end DOES NOT HAPPEN. Frankly I think you should be able to set the point where it shuffles in that game, I don’t want it to play to 35 every time and it should let me choose where it is if it is to be a simulator that operates on the parameters I set to simulate actual conditions. You are also unrealistic to expect heat after 1 mere hour. I’ve played for hours and hours and left the casinos with so many half-dollars from blackjacks that my pants were falling down (I would bet an odd $ amount every time if the min bet was odd already, so that I could track the # of blackjacks I have by the # of half dollars I have, this would also give me an idea of the # of hands I played total). Also, don’t leave when the count goes negative. Just bet the minimum bet. You’re stealing from the other players, not the house, if you leave them when it’s negative or stand back and look over their shoulders and sit down when the count goes highly positive. I’m not there to steal from the other players.
I think most of this is your own superstitions. First of all, I take insurance on the min bet all the time in 2-deck games…. because the count can change as a result of the current hand being dealt out. Remember I decided on my bet amount before any cards were dealt out that hand. I decide if I want insurance after seeing the dealer’s ace, my 2 cards, and all the other players’. I may have bet the minimum because the truecount was only 1, and then suddenly when the hand is dealt, it’s 3 and the dealer shows an ace and guess what, I’d be taking insurance anyway. In other words there’s a disconnect between the count when you determine the bet size and when you make your decisions.
To see how superstitious you are being, allow me to put 2 inconsistent things you said side by side, and I think it will be obvious:
1. a ‘fanny pack’ has got to be one of the most disarming items a counter can wear. With that and a pair of glasses on, damn few supervisors will ever think you’re this cold-blooded, card counting, steely-eyed destroyer of casinos
2. Dress appropriately for your betting level. A ‘high-roller’ should look like a prosperous person not, as one author put it, “like an out-of-work substitute school teacher.”
For you to actually believe both of these are sound pieces of advice without seeing the contradiction, requires some irrationality on your part. You are simply projecting thoughts and motivations onto the security personnel, you’re SUPPOSING that’s the way they see it. But that is magical thinking… to think the way you see it is the way others see it and that it affects reality. Magical thinking has no place in a logical strategy in this game.
Also I hesitate on stiff hands all the time. Just because I’m an advantage player, doesn’t mean I’m not dreading the consequences of my decisions every step of the way, and often thinking heavily on whether the count is above or below a threshold for doing one thing or another, there’s another reason to hesitate.
Honestly, the “deviations” to basic strategy are all you need to alleviate their suspicions most of the time. One time I was banned was after playing all day long for many many days. According to my casino log, on October 2, 7,10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 24 and 27 of one year. All at the same casino. Most of them many hours in a row. I was “trespassed” when I walked in on October 29. The other time, was when I…. stepped out too many times for negative counts. You don’t want to hear it, I’m sure, but that’s the surest way to get their attention…. to walk out on a shoe when the count goes negative instead of playing through. It’s a bad practice anyway since what you’re really doing is taking money from the other players at the table, not the house, since the only money you’re saving is the bets of the minimum bet size, and they will have to play more hands with your absence to get through the same number of cards. That was when I decided to stop doing that…. I decided later it was actually unethical to do it as well.
È buffo. Non mi preoccupo di valutarle in coppia, le faccio una alla volta o eventualmente più di due alla volta, se è la prima volta che ho accesso a quell'informazione, ad esempio se stavo guardando da un'altra parte o se ero distratto o se si tratta di una carta a faccia in giù e un mazzo è rovesciato. Dal mio punto di vista, il dealer più veloce è praticamente un ghiacciaio. Non ha senso prendere in considerazione l'idea di contarle 2 alla volta quando alla fine ne distribuisce ancora una alla volta e quando dopo ognuna di esse ho tutto il tempo prima che riveli la successiva. In definitiva, il modo di dire è sbagliato. L'occhio è più veloce della mano. Ho il tempo di osservare ogni minimo movimento della mano del mazziere, effettivamente al rallentatore rispetto alla mia velocità di percezione, mentre fa scivolare una carta dalla scarpa e la spinge verso la prima base, la gira per scoprirla, poi prende la seconda, e poi prende la successiva per darla alla seconda base. Quando ha girato la seconda carta, la prima è già nella mia somma di corsa. Non dovrebbe essere difficile farlo. Non c'è spazio per guardarle due alla volta. Ma anche se non le vedete una alla volta, non dovrebbe essere difficile vederne 4 o 5 alla volta e conoscere il numero di carte basse meno il numero di carte alte in quel piccolo insieme, per esempio vedere un gruppo di 5 carte, vedere che sono 4 carte basse e un 8, e aggiungere semplicemente 4 alla mia somma corrente. Sono così veloce? In base alle partite di scacchi blitz online, non credo che la mia velocità sia particolarmente speciale.
Why can’t I surrender?
Qual è la strategia di base per i totali morbidi con 3 o più carte?
HOW COME YOU DEAL THE DEALER SO MANY 20/
No it isn’t. Not even close. You need a bankroll of like 500 times the min bet to have a risk of ruin of 50%. So if the min bet is 50, you would need 25 thousand dollars. To have a risk of ruin of 50%. A bankroll of 50 thousand dollars gives a risk of ruin of 25%. A bankroll of 100 thousand dollars gives a risk of ruin of 6.25%. I’d say, if there’s a table with a min bet of 50, RUN IN THE OTHER DIRECTION!
He discusses when to quit in this article if you read it. When the true count drops to -3 or lower…
and your stupid to bet more than 50 dollars of hard earned money too. Blackjack should be fun,not ruined by high stake gamblers like you.6 to 5 blackjack is unacceptable,and anybody that plays blackjack that has a clue would make a stand against these casinos ruing players odds by making 6 to 6 blackjack.whether its 1 dollar minimum,or 1000 dollar minimum,blackjack should allways payout 3 to 2.
I don’t agree. You can win with proper money managent.
I agree. Wish it did not reset when taking a break.
With money manage it works 2 out of 3 times for me.
In assenza di fattori attenuanti, due mazzi tagliati su sei sono un pessimo gioco.
"Non si possono battere"? Allora perché i casinò continuano a buttare fuori le persone e ad abusare di loro?
https://bj21.com/category/patron-abuse/pages/links-to-media-coverage-of-casino-abuse-of-patrons
No.
I prodotti Apple, essendo non standard, presentano problemi quando si utilizza il software normale, quindi non è possibile affermare in modo definitivo che qualsiasi software normale funzionerà correttamente su qualsiasi prodotto Apple. Mi dispiace, vorrei che ci fosse una risposta migliore.