Yeah ok, call them back and ask them specifically what law they are referring to. They will end up telling you its actually their 'policy', not the law.QFIT said:I called the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation and they said it was illegal. But, they're probably wrong since they didn't say it in all caps
So according to this info (which I admit might be dated) the only place where there is an outright prohibition is in NV. Even Atlantic City can only ask you to leave, which they can do if you are counting in your head anyways. And look at the charge if you return: disorderly conduct. Nothing to do with the device at all.computers (concealed). Concealed computers that are used as an aid in counting cards are not permitted in casinos. Blackjack computers have been designed to determine the true count or to make perfect playing decisions based on a given count. Specific statutes exist in Nevada that make it a felony to use these devices. In Atlantic City, you'll be asked to leave if you're caught with a concealed computer. If you return with your device, you can be arrested on a disorderly conduct charge. Atlantic City casinos are now lobbying for a tougher law.
QFIT said:Don't believe everything you see on the I'Net.
New Jersey Casino Control Act
Article 9
5:12-113.1 Use of device to obtain advantage at casino game a disorderly persons offense; forfeiture; notice
a. A person commits a third degree offense if, in playing a game in a licensed casino or simulcasting facility, the person uses, or assists another in the use of, a computerized, electronic, electrical or mechanical device which is designed, constructed, or programmed specifically for use in obtaining an advantage at playing any game in a licensed casino or simulcasting facility, unless the advantage obtained can be assessed a monetary value or loss of $75,000 or greater in which case the offense is a crime of the second degree.
b. Any computerized, electronic, electrical or mechanical device used in violation of subsection a. of this section shall be considered prima facie contraband and shall be subject to the provisions of N.J.S. 2C:64-2. A device used by any person in violation of this section shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to the provisions of N.J.S.2C:64-1 et seq.
SystemsTrader said:OK CountCards you need to look at it from our perspective as card counters. Let's say you are right and it is not illegal but it is against casino policy. Either way it is a losing situation for counters if they get caught, because we will be kicked out and unable to perform our craft in that casino anymore. If caught with a computer they have physical evidence as proof you are a counter. If they catch you the traditional way while they assume you are a counter they really have no way to actually prove it.
Since you are Canadian I will put it into an analogy you will surely understand. While fighting in hockey is not illegal, if you are caught fighting you are penalized and kicked out of the game and are no longer any use to your team.
Very interesting information, particularly the part about being forced to pay people who were using the devices....and that they aren't being banned outright....(the devices that is).zengrifter said:Here is the roulette device in the news! zg
http://www.predictroulette.com/
Here is the previous discussion - http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/showthread.php?t=1763
---------------------
For sale for £1,000: gadget that means you'll never lose at roulette again
· Using hidden device 'does not count as cheating'
· System can give 100% advantage over casino
Paul Lewis
Saturday September 16, 2006
The Guardian
Professional gamblers are rushing to buy £1,000 devices that they believe will enable them to win millions of pounds in casinos when the gambling industry is deregulated next year.
Hundreds of the roulette-cheating machines - which consist of a small digital time recorder, a concealed computer and a hidden earpiece - were tested at a government laboratory in 2004 after a gang suspected of using them won £1.3m at the Ritz casino in London.
...continued here - http://www.guardian.co.uk/gambling/story/0,,1873910,00.html
This is an expert counters site. If we were inclined towards devices we would use devices STRONGER than what you are offering (ie, video, laser sighting, roulette, etc.). zgCountCardsandWin said:I don't get why people are being so difficult, if you can count cards in your head then thats all fine and dandy, do so! If you don't like my product, then move on.....some people want to do it my way.
Thorp's Mathmatics of Gambling can provide you with the methodology, and others. I beleive that you can get the algorithms off the Web somewhere.CountCardsandWin said:Hehheh maybe I need to rejig for roulette....
Thats what I want to hear, I am a technology person and I dream of these devices like kids at x-mas dream of sugar plums....I have often dreamed of an auto-recognition counting system, where a camera is trained on the table and automatically reads the cards as they are dealt....of course once you have the data there are numerous possiblities (counting/tracking/ etc. etc. etc.)zengrifter said:This is an expert counters site. If we were inclined towards devices we would use devices STRONGER than what you are offering (ie, video, laser sighting, roulette, etc.). zg
How about a bionic arm that can throw controlled dice shots! zgCountCardsandWin said:Thats what I want to hear, I am a technology person and I dream of these devices like kids at x-mas dream of sugar plums....I have often dreamed of an auto-recognition counting system, where a camera is trained on the table and automatically reads the cards as they are dealt....of course once you have the data there are numerous possiblities (counting/tracking/ etc. etc. etc.)
now theres one i hadn't thought of. But then again theres no craps in most of the casinos i've been to in Canada...zengrifter said:How about a bionic arm that can throw controlled dice shots! zg
How about for shuffle tracking? Major Tom is in the casino watching a shoe and talking on his cell phone to Ground Control, who is busily punching numbers into his desktop at home. At the end of the shoe, Ground Control hits the "Go" button, and a few seconds later tells Major Tom the play zones of the next shoe. Major Tom hangs up, turns off his cell phone, and plays the next shoe at great advantage.zengrifter said:This is an expert counters site. If we were inclined towards devices we would use devices STRONGER than what you are offering (ie, video, laser sighting, roulette, etc.). zg
I'd guess so, the cell phone would be the device. But more in line with the postmodern definition of the word "illegal"- a synonym for "Is it illegal?" is "Can you get caught?" You'd think the casino would have a difficult time proving what was being discussed in that conversation without a wiretap.QFIT said:Yes that's illegal in the US. It doesn't have to be a computer. If you have a shiny lighter that allows you to see the hole card it's an illegal device.
That's exactly what Keith Taft's "Thor" computer was. It was incredibly powerful and could be concealed on the player's body:Automatic Monkey said:How about for shuffle tracking?
Technically yes because you are still using a “device” to predict the outcome of the game. It doesn’t matter if the device is in your pocket, in the parking lot or across the country.Automatic Monkey said:At the end of the shoe, Ground Control hits the "Go" button, and a few seconds later tells Major Tom the play zones of the next shoe. Major Tom hangs up, turns off his cell phone, and plays the next shoe at great advantage. Is that illegal?
I LIKE THIS ONE!!! zg(Turning republican so AutoMonk will share it with me!)Automatic Monkey said:How about for shuffle tracking? Major Tom is in the casino watching a shoe and talking on his cell phone to Ground Control, who is busily punching numbers into his desktop at home. At the end of the shoe, Ground Control hits the "Go" button, and a few seconds later tells Major Tom the play zones of the next shoe. Major Tom hangs up, turns off his cell phone, and plays the next shoe at great advantage.
Is that illegal? The computer being used was nowhere near the casino, and Major Tom was just talking on his cell phone like dozens of other people in the casino.
(I've already written the software!)
I don't think that it would be illegal for two reasons - 1) the device is not used "at the table", and 2) the Device Law is unconstitutional as currently written in Nevada. I'll also add that executed optimally it would be impossible to prosecute. LETS DO IT! zgAutomatic Monkey said:I'd guess so, the cell phone would be the device.