Your edge was higher than what you make your max bet at. Why would you not bet AT LEAST 15?? zgHunch said:Referring to LL side bets made at +10. Bet $1 to $5 side bets at +10 or greater, not the $25 max bet.
Newbie at LL. I believe it was your post I read that suggested +10 was the break point with Zen for positive EV playing LL. I tend to play conservative when I'm not sure that I know what I'm doing. I'll probably bet more on LL after more research. Thanks for all your insights!zengrifter said:Your edge was higher than what you make your max bet at. Why would you not bet AT LEAST 15?? zg
Something is not right.Hunch said:Wong Out: 10% of casino time (mostly positive shoes)
Spread: 8:1
Number of Hands: 2 hands 95% of the time.
Bet 10 at +10 / 15 at +11 / 25 at +12 (if no Qh sidecount). zgHunch said:Newbie at LL. I believe it was your post I read that suggested +10 was the break point with Zen for positive EV playing LL. I tend to play conservative when I'm not sure that I know what I'm doing. I'll probably bet more on LL after more research. Thanks for all your insights!
Generally play all. Wonged out only once at -4.zengrifter said:Something is not right.
Are you now playing a full wong? zg
Hunch said:Wong Out: 10% of casino time (mostly positive shoes)
Spread: 8:1
Number of Hands: 2 hands 95% of the time.
zengrifter said:Something is not right.
Are you now playing a full wong? zg
Then, like I said, something is wrong, your play description doesn't add up. zgHunch said:Generally play all. Wonged out only once at -4.
Please explain the issues that concern you.zengrifter said:Then, like I said, something is wrong, your play description doesn't add up. zg
These concern me, for starters >>Hunch said:Please explain the issues that concern you.
Hunch said:Wong Out: 10% of casino time (mostly positive shoes)
Spread: 8:1
Number of Hands: 2 hands 95% of the time.
Zg: Let's take these one at a time.zengrifter said:These concern me, for starters >>
Your short-term results are entirely believable but statistically meaningless.Hunch said:Zg: Let's take these one at a time.
Spread: Are you saying that you have a hard time believing a 1:8 ($10 to $80) spread? Or is it that you don't believe the results are possible with this spread?
I agree that my results are statistically meaningless. I'm just posting the results of my play. I respectfully disagree with your analysis of the spread necessary to beat the game as played.zengrifter said:Your short-term results are entirely believable but statistically meaningless.
Your 1-8 spread is not sufficient for play-all style of the particular game you are playing. zg
I may have misunderstood what the game was.Hunch said:I respectfully disagree with your analysis of the spread necessary to beat the game as played.