Liquid Chips said:
*My own explanation*: Computerized random number generators, at least at this particular online casino, are different from throughly random shuffled live cards.
That’s true, although hand shuffled cards are anything but thoroughly random! RNGs, like those found in online casinos and CSMs, are typically much more random than hand shuffling which is often very extrapolative. If you see card A shuffled into segment B, you know that card A
cannot physically be anywhere except in segment B! That is why hand shuffling is so much more beatable than RNG distributions. After all, you don’t see people shuffle tracking a CSM do you?
Liquid Chips said:
So in this system, you use a different basic strategy than the normal basic strategy.
How different? What are some of the changes?
Liquid Chips said:
Bigger question is whether there should be software-specific basic strategy developed.....one for playing at Microgaming, one for Playtech, etc. Of course, each would be modified depending upon the rules and number of decks.
The rules and number of decks would have nothing to do with it. The strategy card would have to be altered to account for the non-random distribution of certain cards due to the insufficient RNG. The problem is, you must first determine which cards are being unevenly distributed (if any), then determine the magnitude of the discrepancy, then generate an entirely new BS based on that biased deck. That would take a hell of a lot of work, and there is no certainty that the revised BS would give you an advantage. Since there is no betting strategy that will work for this situation you must rely completely on playing the hands properly.
Judging by that website, I’m not convinced that the author has done any of the above. He even admits that his playing strategy only minimizes the house edge, not overcomes it. Something just doesn't seem right about this "secret cheating system."
-Sonny-