Of course. I'm not saying that I invented a working system or that it is possible to do so.ohbehave said:All of this is speculation.
Yeah. That's why I asked what are the odds that you will win 100 playing 10 20 60 progression... If you win 4 out of 10 that's ok with me.ohbehave said:You have to win the $100 first before you can gamble with it.
I see your point. What I want to test right now if a good money money management can give you some edge to overcome this problem.ohbehave said:There is no math behind a progression that can prove it a longterm winner. I believe you know this but you are choosing to ignore it. Hey, I've been there. I started playing BJ with a progression and was convinced it worked. Luckily some good folks here steered my right and I quit the progression before I lost a ton of money. If a progression was a winning strategy you would not have to walk away after either winning or losing $100. Just keep playing forever.
Interesting...So you usually make good money flat-betting till you increase your bets at the right count? I thought card counters have the same bad sessions as basic strategy players. They just win more in the long run. Or just win Am I wrong?ohbehave said:The only reason AP's limit there playing time is due to exposure otherwise if we were allowed we would play night and day and only stop to make trips to the bank.