dark_hatchling
Active Member
What percent of penetration would most of you consider to be playable? At least 75% ? And at what percent does it typically make card counting ineffective?
Thanks
Thanks
Here is something to get you starteddark_hatchling said:is there like a guide to what would be acceptable for certain games/rules? Trying to determine whats good at some local casinos
When doing nothing but back counting and wonging, any percentage of pen can be played. The math IS the math.dark_hatchling said:What percent of penetration would most of you consider to be playable? At least 75% ? And at what percent does it typically make card counting ineffective?
Thanks
Yep, this, his book has what he considers are bad, average, good pen. If I recall correctly, 75% is decent.Xenophon said:by Arnold Snyder. It has a chart that balances all of the factors needed to determine if the game is playable.
Right. He named his chart "The Snyder Profit Index." It takes into account:Gamblor said:Yep, this, his book has what he considers are bad, average, good pen. If I recall correctly, 75% is decent.
what page is the chart on? ah i'll look harder when i get off work.Xenophon said:Right. He named his chart "The Snyder Profit Index." It takes into account:
1) number of players
2) percent dealt
3) rules
4) spread
It then defines the game as a winner, table hop only, or time waster.
I recommend first getting this, then getting CVCX.
pgs. 120-121dark_hatchling said:what page is the chart on? ah i'll look harder when i get off work.
I have the 2005 edition and its where Xenophon says (p 120-121). Its in chapter 11 "Table Conditions" if that helps.dark_hatchling said:hmm... seems to not be there, Iv'e got the "revised and expanded" edition, reprinted in 1998
A bit of an over statement, don't you think old chap? zgBilly C1 said:When doing nothing but back counting and wonging, any percentage of pen can be played.
How so?zengrifter said:A bit of an over statement, don't you think old chap? zg