quote: Bobby
I have read your book and i just want you to know that your circle of 13 is crap but at least i did take some of your advice and did not waist the $.75 and buy the book i just borrowed it.
i tried to read Cutting Edge Blackjack. i found it virtually impossible to understand, but what ever i'm young and easily confused.FLASH1296 said:Bobby, pulleeze share the gems of wisdom that you extracted from your 6 bit investment.
Young and easily confused??? lolsagefr0g said:i tried to read Cutting Edge Blackjack. i found it virtually impossible to understand, but what ever i'm young and easily confused.
i will say that i found one concept interesting after having tried to read the book. that being the concept of the value of 'if one knew what the dealer's hole card was' sort of thing.
i would guess that Mr. Harvey might respond and say such a concept is not a part of the idea of his book, but alas, Mr. Harvey is not able to respond.
Obsolete? There are still purposes of CC in HC games, such as when given a 9 v dealer 4 with a 3 in the hole. If you CC, you can determine if this is worthy of a double. Also, what if you miss the HC? The power of CC is synergistic with HC, it increases your advantage in HCing than it does in a BS game. Also, there are (apparently) true counts where even HCing is a -EV game. While employing even a 1-2 spread may be not worth the risk, I wouldn't say CC is obsolete. Just not really worth the effort (if it takes effort).aslan said:Young and easily confused??? lol
If I knew the dealer's hole card, card counting would indeed be obsolete. So would poverty.
I can live with knowing the dealer's hole card alone. In fact, I can live quite comfortably. :laugh:SleightOfHand said:Obsolete? There are still purposes of CC in HC games, such as when given a 9 v dealer 4 with a 3 in the hole. If you CC, you can determine if this is worthy of a double. Also, what if you miss the HC? The power of CC is synergistic with HC, it increases your advantage in HCing than it does in a BS game. Also, there are (apparently) true counts where even HCing is a -EV game. While employing even a 1-2 spread may be not worth the risk, I wouldn't say CC is obsolete. Just not really worth the effort (if it takes effort).
...like knowing when not to adjust your bets. You don't want to accidentally get tagged as a card counter...unless you're trying to protect something or someone.SleightOfHand said:There are still purposes of CC in HC games...
How much does counting actually add th HC? Or do we need ExCAA to answer that?SleightOfHand said:Obsolete? There are still purposes of CC in HC games, such as when given a 9 v dealer 4 with a 3 in the hole. If you CC, you can determine if this is worthy of a double. Also, what if you miss the HC? The power of CC is synergistic with HC, it increases your advantage in HCing than it does in a BS game. Also, there are (apparently) true counts where even HCing is a -EV game. While employing even a 1-2 spread may be not worth the risk, I wouldn't say CC is obsolete. Just not really worth the effort (if it takes effort).
I discussed HC betting and playing indexes a bit at Modern Blackjack pages 464-466.zengrifter said:How much does counting actually add th HC? Or do we need ExCAA to answer that?
I would say not enough to warrant the effort. zg
Oh, yes Modern Blackjack - Stalker wants to get a signed copy. zgQFIT said:I discussed HC betting and playing indexes a bit at Modern Blackjack pages 464-466.
Sagefr0g said:i will say that i found one concept interesting after having tried to read the book. that being the concept of the value of 'if one knew what the dealer's hole card was' sort of thing.