Oh I am sorry. My max bet varies according to different games and more importantly individual casinos and how much I think they will tolerate from me. For the most part it is a single hand of $400, but I have a few locations that I jump above what I perceive as an important 'heat threshold of $500' and play $600 and on rare moster count occasions more. I also have been experimenting some with playing 2 hands of up to $400. This is something I have avoided doing for heat reasons all of my career. Wouldn't you know it that when I start experimenting with getting more money on the table during high counts, I hit a period such as this. I must be a decendant of the 'Murphy's" :laugh:shinyam said:Holy smokes. That's a huge hit. Luckily you had a good run before.
I'm sure you will do fine. The odds of something like that happening again are astronomically small (though I don't know what your max bet is).
After I bought simulation software - sure enough - hit a downswing on bigger ramping. Just have to ride it through. I would also add that buying sim software was the smartest thing I have done as an AP - earnings have grown dramatically.kewljason said:Wouldn't you know it that when I start experimenting with getting more money on the table during high counts, I hit a period such as this. I must decendants of the 'Murphy's" :laugh:
Absolutely true, Freightman. Mine paid for itself 1000 times over, literally.Freightman said:After I bought simulation software - sure enough - hit a downswing on bigger ramping. Just have to ride it through. I would also add that buying sim software was the smartest thing I have done as an AP - earnings have grown dramatically.
Totally agree. I recall having multiple six figure losing streaks in less than a week. Granted I was playing mediocre shoe games and betting 7x500 but still. Not trying to rub it in, but the run KJ had where he at one point had won more in one shoe than he ever had as a drawdown was truly unreal and unlikely to continue.suicyco maniac said:Those are both fairly small and common downturns at the $500 max level.
Well, definitely not an expert ST'er or anything, so take what I say for what its worth (I more ST in addition to CC'ing) - but in a sense the short term variance is greater since I'm making bigger bets more often then I would straight up CC'ing. ST'ing ain't no license to print money either, the % advantages you get with it are similar to CC'ing. You can get sh*t as 13's and 14's while the dealer and everyone else get the 10's and Aces just like counting :sad:psyduck said:I have alway been interested in what kind of swing hole carders and shuffle trackers have experienced in comparison to straight counting, but I do not remember seeing this kind of information here. Anyone?
HC'ing BJ. If such a thing is possible nowadaysHsiaoDi said:10%? :?
From what I have read, a blackjack player and a HC player betting the same kelly fraction will experience the same swings, but the higher the edge the faster the swings happen. By this I mean they both have the same chance of doubling or halving their bankroll, which may be different than "swings."psyduck said:I have alway been interested in what kind of swing hole carders and shuffle trackers have experienced in comparison to straight counting, but I do not remember seeing this kind of information here. Anyone?