Aquí están todos los comentarios publicados en el sitio, con los debates más recientes en primer lugar.
Para participar en cualquiera de estos debates, puede responder en la página del artículo.
The article failed to mention caveats to overall strategy, and objective.
I’ll run a negative progression at times. Never by itself of course. That’s stupid. There are ways to MAKE the Casino THINK you’re running negative progression, and actually hide it in something else (No, I’m not giving away everything here).
Regardless, as with any mathematical game, you have to take into account strategy, and objective. Of course, this is taking into account that the individual is not a degen, and is actually going to “work” when they walk into the casino.
You run counting cards, and the rest of your strategy, and you’re up your target amount, plus a little spill over your target. Here … I’ll give you one for free.
Take that SPILL ONLY (and sometimes, if you want every dealer to be in love with you until the end of time, the tip amount) and run your strategy on a strict Martingale. You’ve already made your money. So just run the spill, down to a predetermined kill arena, but run strict negative progression until you hit the new target, or your kill spot is hit.
You __ MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT STRATEGY SPECIFICS __ before throwing around “never’s” and “Dont event think about” ‘s
Blackjack is actually a simple game to beat, with even a rudimentary understanding of differential mathematics; which in my opinion, they should be teaching to 9 year olds.
The Cromwell has made a big push going the opposite direction. Almost entire retail floor is 3/2 shoe and pitch double deck. $10-$15mins normally from what I’ve seen. Maybe up to $25 on the pitch at times but that’s still better than the rest of the strip. Should check it out.
ÉXITO DEL JUGADOR ÉXITO DEL JUGADOR ÉXITO DEL JUGADOR ÉXITO DEL JUGADOR
12 31.000% 1 69.000% 52.755% 47.245% 46.200% 3 53.800%
13 39.000% 1 61.000% 53.822% 46.178% 50.900% 3 49.100%
14 47.000% 1 53.000% 55.932% 44.068% 55.000% 3 45.000%
15 58.000% 2 42.000% 59.772% 40.228% 58.600% 3 41.400%
16 62.000% 2 38.000% 59.834% 40.166% 61.500% 3 38.500%
Golpe o parada 1
lolblackjack 2
blackjackinfo 3
y pregunta extrema basada en la información de W y coroborating información encontrada en Internet y mi simultated
el jugador tiene un 14 duro. Si la carta descubierta del crupier es un 5, la tasa de bust out del crupier sería 41.841%
deduciendo que la tasa de éxito del crupier sería de 60,590%. Si aceptamos el porcentaje de pérdidas del crupier de 41,841% como porcentaje de éxito, según los gráficos anteriores yo tendría un mínimo de 44,068% de conseguir mi mano.
La tasa de ÉXITO de 44,068% es superior a la de 41,841% que ofrece la sabiduría convencional. ¿Me estoy perdiendo algo?
si es así qué o todos hemos sido condicionados con éxito a perder por el hombre.
he sacado 1, 2 y 3 de las respectivas páginas web y la 3 la he sacado de este foro:KenSmith
mis datos proceden de mi simulador personal.
espero que lo anterior tenga sentido
También es frecuente que acierte y no se pase, pero que pierda contra una mano mejor de la banca. Su pregunta parece asumir que si no se pasa, ganará la mano. No, puede que gane, puede que pierda y puede que se pase.
Por cierto, cada vez me paso menos por aquí porque ya no estoy asociado al sitio. Te recomiendo que lleves tus preguntas a los foros si quieres tener más posibilidades de obtener una respuesta.
en realidad mi MÍO incluye el
Ganancias, Empates, Pérdidas en una mano hecha, y busting out
Acabo de utilizar los resultados de los otros sitios web para hacer
el punto
Hmm it seems like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying
your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing.
Do you have any tips and hints for newbie blog writers?
I’d definitely appreciate it.
Mobile version of Blackjack strategy trainer. Rules: 1 Deck, Dealer hits soft 17, Double any card, No double after split, Never offer insurance. Had pair of 4s against dealer 5, tried to double as your basic strategy chart recommends, but got message that basic strategy was to split. On another occasion had Ace/7 against dealer Ace, tried to hit as your basic strategy chart recommends, but got message that basic strategy was to stand. Also, would it be possible to have a $1 wager increment and $2000 max bet option.
Was flagged at the Borgata almost ten years ago & then Caesars. To this day I have played in most major venues & have not been escorted out. Although there are “lists” all over the country, some casinos are not as “tight” as others. Perfect example would be the Tribal casinos in CT. I spent 9 months in one of them going through the paces & took them for 250K. On top of that their comps at the time were great. I knew there were times when I was being run down, so I just took it easy. Aside from the discipline of tracking, you should always consider unit betting which will help disguise your edge.
no, if the player has over 21 he/she has busted their hand resulting in a loss. The dealer must pick up ones chip if they bust (making over 21). In your case hitting 15 and catching an ace gives you 16 which is not over 21. The goal playing blackjack is to not bust your hand but to get close to 21 as possible. Your odds on busting 16 is greater as you only have 16% chance of catching your cards. This also depends on how many high cards have been played. The more high cards played makes your odds better of making a better. 16 in blackjack in usually a surrender hand but some casinos don’t allow surrender. In this case your better bet is to stay or hit.
Sí, estoy muy de acuerdo con esto. Yo estaba jugando e hice algo en contra de las reglas. este tipo lo mencionó, y siguió mencionándolo, un par de manos más tarde. como si dijera que mi decisión afectó a sus cartas 2-3 manos más tarde. pero hubo muchos otros eventos que ocurrieron después de mi elección de no seguir las reglas. Creo en las ventajas situacionales y, en general, juego según "las reglas", pero decir que mi decisión de no jugar las reglas afectó a muchos acontecimientos posteriores es delirante.
The article failed to mention caveats to overall strategy, and objective.
I’ll run a negative progression at times. Never by itself of course. That’s stupid. There are ways to MAKE the Casino THINK you’re running negative progression, and actually hide it in something else (No, I’m not giving away everything here).
Regardless, as with any mathematical game, you have to take into account strategy, and objective. Of course, this is taking into account that the individual is not a degen, and is actually going to “work” when they walk into the casino.
You run counting cards, and the rest of your strategy, and you’re up your target amount, plus a little spill over your target. Here … I’ll give you one for free.
Take that SPILL ONLY (and sometimes, if you want every dealer to be in love with you until the end of time, the tip amount) and run your strategy on a strict Martingale. You’ve already made your money. So just run the spill, down to a predetermined kill arena, but run strict negative progression until you hit the new target, or your kill spot is hit.
You __ MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT STRATEGY SPECIFICS __ before throwing around “never’s” and “Dont event think about” ‘s
Blackjack is actually a simple game to beat, with even a rudimentary understanding of differential mathematics; which in my opinion, they should be teaching to 9 year olds.
The Cromwell has made a big push going the opposite direction. Almost entire retail floor is 3/2 shoe and pitch double deck. $10-$15mins normally from what I’ve seen. Maybe up to $25 on the pitch at times but that’s still better than the rest of the strip. Should check it out.
un poco sobre el tema
jugador de 12 a 16 se refieren a mi gráfico
6 Decks Dealer Stands on Soft 17 Extracto De
W* of O*'s DEALER'S FINAL TOTAL MY SIMULATOR
UP CARD BUST SUCCESS BUST SUCCESS
2 35.350% 64.650% 38.095% 61.905%
3 37.419% 62.581% 38.849% 61.151%
4 39.410% 60.590% 39.410% 60.590%
5 41.841% 58.159% 40.183% 59.817%
6 42.284% 57.716% 45.152% 54.848%
ÉXITO DEL JUGADOR ÉXITO DEL JUGADOR ÉXITO DEL JUGADOR ÉXITO DEL JUGADOR
12 31.000% 1 69.000% 52.755% 47.245% 46.200% 3 53.800%
13 39.000% 1 61.000% 53.822% 46.178% 50.900% 3 49.100%
14 47.000% 1 53.000% 55.932% 44.068% 55.000% 3 45.000%
15 58.000% 2 42.000% 59.772% 40.228% 58.600% 3 41.400%
16 62.000% 2 38.000% 59.834% 40.166% 61.500% 3 38.500%
Golpe o parada 1
lolblackjack 2
blackjackinfo 3
y pregunta extrema basada en la información de W y coroborating información encontrada en Internet y mi simultated
el jugador tiene un 14 duro. Si la carta descubierta del crupier es un 5, la tasa de bust out del crupier sería 41.841%
deduciendo que la tasa de éxito del crupier sería de 60,590%. Si aceptamos el porcentaje de pérdidas del crupier de 41,841% como porcentaje de éxito, según los gráficos anteriores yo tendría un mínimo de 44,068% de conseguir mi mano.
La tasa de ÉXITO de 44,068% es superior a la de 41,841% que ofrece la sabiduría convencional. ¿Me estoy perdiendo algo?
si es así qué o todos hemos sido condicionados con éxito a perder por el hombre.
he sacado 1, 2 y 3 de las respectivas páginas web y la 3 la he sacado de este foro:KenSmith
mis datos proceden de mi simulador personal.
espero que lo anterior tenga sentido
lo siento estaba formateado correctamente cuando lo publique.
También es frecuente que acierte y no se pase, pero que pierda contra una mano mejor de la banca. Su pregunta parece asumir que si no se pasa, ganará la mano. No, puede que gane, puede que pierda y puede que se pase.
Por cierto, cada vez me paso menos por aquí porque ya no estoy asociado al sitio. Te recomiendo que lleves tus preguntas a los foros si quieres tener más posibilidades de obtener una respuesta.
en realidad mi MÍO incluye el
Ganancias, Empates, Pérdidas en una mano hecha, y busting out
Acabo de utilizar los resultados de los otros sitios web para hacer
el punto
gracias
Hmm it seems like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying
your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing.
Do you have any tips and hints for newbie blog writers?
I’d definitely appreciate it.
The “quit ” button is not working.
Thhis is a topic that is close to my heart… Thank you!
Where aｒe ʏour contact details thoսgh?
¿Una jota negra y una reina roja es un Blackjack?
I’d like to have the option to mute the sounds so i can play without disturbing my sleeping significant other….
Try turning down the volume on your device.
Do not like that strategy trainer can be turned off. Would like to see what I learned.
Mobile version of Blackjack strategy trainer. Rules: 1 Deck, Dealer hits soft 17, Double any card, No double after split, Never offer insurance. Had pair of 4s against dealer 5, tried to double as your basic strategy chart recommends, but got message that basic strategy was to split. On another occasion had Ace/7 against dealer Ace, tried to hit as your basic strategy chart recommends, but got message that basic strategy was to stand. Also, would it be possible to have a $1 wager increment and $2000 max bet option.
I enjoy reading and trying to learn all I can about blackjack, how do I start free blackjack School
Tournament play, common practice to split 10’s.
Tournament play V regular table play, splitting 10’s a common play.
Was flagged at the Borgata almost ten years ago & then Caesars. To this day I have played in most major venues & have not been escorted out. Although there are “lists” all over the country, some casinos are not as “tight” as others. Perfect example would be the Tribal casinos in CT. I spent 9 months in one of them going through the paces & took them for 250K. On top of that their comps at the time were great. I knew there were times when I was being run down, so I just took it easy. Aside from the discipline of tracking, you should always consider unit betting which will help disguise your edge.
no, if the player has over 21 he/she has busted their hand resulting in a loss. The dealer must pick up ones chip if they bust (making over 21). In your case hitting 15 and catching an ace gives you 16 which is not over 21. The goal playing blackjack is to not bust your hand but to get close to 21 as possible. Your odds on busting 16 is greater as you only have 16% chance of catching your cards. This also depends on how many high cards have been played. The more high cards played makes your odds better of making a better. 16 in blackjack in usually a surrender hand but some casinos don’t allow surrender. In this case your better bet is to stay or hit.
Sí, estoy muy de acuerdo con esto. Yo estaba jugando e hice algo en contra de las reglas. este tipo lo mencionó, y siguió mencionándolo, un par de manos más tarde. como si dijera que mi decisión afectó a sus cartas 2-3 manos más tarde. pero hubo muchos otros eventos que ocurrieron después de mi elección de no seguir las reglas. Creo en las ventajas situacionales y, en general, juego según "las reglas", pero decir que mi decisión de no jugar las reglas afectó a muchos acontecimientos posteriores es delirante.