Aquí están todos los comentarios publicados en el sitio, con los debates más recientes en primer lugar.
Para participar en cualquiera de estos debates, puede responder en la página del artículo.
Wong. He oído ese nombre. Bueno Sr. Wong, si usted lee esto, déjeme decirle algo, que si veo a alguien "wonging in" en medio de mi zapato, robando mis cartas altas cuando la baraja es rica, o "wonging out", dejándome tomar las cartas bajas cuando la baraja se vuelve mala, me indignaré mucho, y si lo hace repetidamente, consideraré reportar lo que está haciendo al jefe del pit aunque probablemente significaría que yo también sería expulsado del casino a menos que sea muy cauteloso en cómo lo hago. Ya que esa práctica es en realidad robar a los otros jugadores. Eso es lo que es. Recuérdelo, Sr. Wong. Si entras a mitad del zapato, cuando la cuenta va alta, o si te vas a mitad del zapato cuando va super negativa, en realidad estás robando a los otros jugadores, no simplemente mejorando tu rendimiento frente a la casa. Si soy el único en la mesa y el recuento sube y quedan suficientes cartas en el zapato para 15 manos sólo conmigo en la mesa, sólo habrá suficientes cartas para 10 manos más con otra persona en su lugar, ya que si soy yo, otra persona y el crupier, eso usa 1.5 veces más cartas por mano que sólo yo y el crupier (un poco peor que eso en realidad, ya que el crupier nunca dividirá las manos, por lo que en promedio, el jugador utiliza más cartas que el crupier, por lo que es tal vez una proporción de 3,2 a 2,1, tal vez será 9 en lugar de 15 manos restantes). Estoy contento de jugar en la misma mesa que alguien que está contando, diablos, si me doy cuenta, y pierdo la cuenta, puede que te mire y apueste lo mismo que tú, y eres bienvenido a hacer lo mismo por mí. Pero si te vas a la mitad de una mano o entras cuando ya he sufrido la primera mitad, absorbiendo cartas bajas todo el tiempo para hacer que se caliente en primer lugar y que alguien que entra así me niegue el premio que tanto me ha costado ganar, podrías estar robando fichas de mi pila y no lo toleraré. Espero que asumas tu castigo junto conmigo si quieres contar cartas conmigo en la mesa, que lo sufras tú mismo cuando el recuento sea malo y que no me utilices sólo como una herramienta para gastar las cartas que no quieres. También tendrás menos probabilidades de que el casino te prohíba jugar. Incluso cuando juego solo, me siento y recibo mi castigo, ¡he visto el truecount bajar hasta -14! Y hago cosas LOCAS cuando eso ocurre, he apostado 14 contra el 6 del crupier antes, he apostado 17 antes, y puedes estar seguro de que apuesto el mínimo, pero aún así me siento y acepto mi castigo.
I have a question. What is better: bet $100 in one place or $50 in two places at the same table, considering a positive count?
I believe that at the same table there is a high correlation among the hands. On the other hand, the risk of playing two places at the same hand is fewer.
Betting two spots of $50 is better than one spot of $100. The expected win is the same, but the risk will be quite a bit lower despite high correlation between the hands. In fact, you have roughly the same risk betting two spots of $75 each as one spot of $100. And in that case, the total $150 bet over two spots will of course have a higher expected win in positive counts than the $100 single bet.
Do this Hi-Lo indexes apply with the European blackjack rules??
(no peek, dealer stands at soft 17, double any 2 cards, double after splits, no surrender, 4/6/8 decks)
Yes, the index numbers will be fine for a European no-peek game, with one adjustment: Ignore any index that has you doubling or splitting against a dealer ten or Ace.
Read a book called ” Against the Gods”. It is a well documented book on the history of risk including casino games. One of the points that has stuck with me is………the longer you play blackjack the higher the percentage of losing comes your way. A good read.
Time is a factor in the equation. It helped me to understand why when you look on the faces of people at a blackjack table it is almost always the same.
With a large enough spread you can beat virtually any game. So yes, you could beat a 6:5 single deck game with counting. Just remember that you won’t have the edge at a 6:5 game until the true count reaches approximately +4. There are easier games to beat.
If your unit is $10, a 1-6 spread means betting from $10 to $60. Bet $10 at negative counts, zero counts, and probably at +1 also depending on the game. At +2 start ramping up until you reach your top bet of $60 at a true count of +5. There are a couple of lessons in the school that delve deeply into how to determine an optimal bet ramp. But as long as you stick to the simple approach I just described, you’ll be fine.
BJ player.
Casino’s put out basic strategy cards because they know it will attract people to play. $1.50 for the card, $20, $40 sit at the table. Just because people have them doesn’t mean they will use them correctly. If they have a hunch or gut feeling or have seen lots of low or high cards come out, they will go with their gut and ignore the card. You just have to remember 2 things. 1. Don’t get mad. They’re only there for a bit of fun. 2 PLAY YOUR GAME. Their decision doesn’t effect your play. GL. a5teve.
This is silly. the same stupid moves those players make can easily benefit you. You just pay more attention to when these players hurt you then when they help you.
I played in North Cyprus the last fortnight and the pros considered the Rocks to the best place to play. It is a fair game with a notch in the shoe to give a decent penetration. 75% even. There are 2 hand shuffle tables at $10 minimum and $25 minimum. These go up during the weekends to a $25 minimum.
If you play here you will be eligible to eat at the restaurant which has a very very decent buffet. The downside is the smoking but in North Cyprus this is the norm. Its worse in the Rocks because of its low ceilings. There are a lot of junkets that come here and the casino are playing to the tune. Counters are easily identified. The table maximum on the $10 table is $200 but its easily over come with a horizontal spread.
A minimal bankroll puts you in a tough spot. You cannot play a positive game without spreading at least 1 to 6 in a multi-deck game, but a top bet of $60 would mean you would usually lose whatever money you bring to the table because of short-term swings. If you are playing for fun, then budget whatever you can afford and spread minimally as you describe from $10 to $20. That is not much better than flat-betting, and perhaps flat-betting would be a better option. Either way your expectation is to lose a small percentage of your overall action. Be sure your basic strategy is solid. That will help.
When playing 10 a hand with no bankroll just paycheck to paycheck what should my spread be with each true count? If the true count is 3 should i bet 20.00 or less? Thanx for your time. Dont really understand the spread i should use
It sounds to me like you’ve just been luckier when practicing at home than when playing in the casino. As an example, I get complaints from players who use my strategy trainer here on the site… Some say “It must be rigged to be too easy. I win a ton!”, while others complain “It must be rigged to be too hard. I can’t ever win!”
Welcome to blackjack. It’s a bumpy ride.
There is no download for the trainer here. If your device is not compatible with Flash, the current version hosted here on this page will not work. I’m hoping to have a new mobile-friendly version available here in early 2016, with LOTS of new features. It’s in progress.
Wong. He oído ese nombre. Bueno Sr. Wong, si usted lee esto, déjeme decirle algo, que si veo a alguien "wonging in" en medio de mi zapato, robando mis cartas altas cuando la baraja es rica, o "wonging out", dejándome tomar las cartas bajas cuando la baraja se vuelve mala, me indignaré mucho, y si lo hace repetidamente, consideraré reportar lo que está haciendo al jefe del pit aunque probablemente significaría que yo también sería expulsado del casino a menos que sea muy cauteloso en cómo lo hago. Ya que esa práctica es en realidad robar a los otros jugadores. Eso es lo que es. Recuérdelo, Sr. Wong. Si entras a mitad del zapato, cuando la cuenta va alta, o si te vas a mitad del zapato cuando va super negativa, en realidad estás robando a los otros jugadores, no simplemente mejorando tu rendimiento frente a la casa. Si soy el único en la mesa y el recuento sube y quedan suficientes cartas en el zapato para 15 manos sólo conmigo en la mesa, sólo habrá suficientes cartas para 10 manos más con otra persona en su lugar, ya que si soy yo, otra persona y el crupier, eso usa 1.5 veces más cartas por mano que sólo yo y el crupier (un poco peor que eso en realidad, ya que el crupier nunca dividirá las manos, por lo que en promedio, el jugador utiliza más cartas que el crupier, por lo que es tal vez una proporción de 3,2 a 2,1, tal vez será 9 en lugar de 15 manos restantes). Estoy contento de jugar en la misma mesa que alguien que está contando, diablos, si me doy cuenta, y pierdo la cuenta, puede que te mire y apueste lo mismo que tú, y eres bienvenido a hacer lo mismo por mí. Pero si te vas a la mitad de una mano o entras cuando ya he sufrido la primera mitad, absorbiendo cartas bajas todo el tiempo para hacer que se caliente en primer lugar y que alguien que entra así me niegue el premio que tanto me ha costado ganar, podrías estar robando fichas de mi pila y no lo toleraré. Espero que asumas tu castigo junto conmigo si quieres contar cartas conmigo en la mesa, que lo sufras tú mismo cuando el recuento sea malo y que no me utilices sólo como una herramienta para gastar las cartas que no quieres. También tendrás menos probabilidades de que el casino te prohíba jugar. Incluso cuando juego solo, me siento y recibo mi castigo, ¡he visto el truecount bajar hasta -14! Y hago cosas LOCAS cuando eso ocurre, he apostado 14 contra el 6 del crupier antes, he apostado 17 antes, y puedes estar seguro de que apuesto el mínimo, pero aún así me siento y acepto mi castigo.
I have a question. What is better: bet $100 in one place or $50 in two places at the same table, considering a positive count?
I believe that at the same table there is a high correlation among the hands. On the other hand, the risk of playing two places at the same hand is fewer.
Betting two spots of $50 is better than one spot of $100. The expected win is the same, but the risk will be quite a bit lower despite high correlation between the hands. In fact, you have roughly the same risk betting two spots of $75 each as one spot of $100. And in that case, the total $150 bet over two spots will of course have a higher expected win in positive counts than the $100 single bet.
Do this Hi-Lo indexes apply with the European blackjack rules??
(no peek, dealer stands at soft 17, double any 2 cards, double after splits, no surrender, 4/6/8 decks)
Yes, the index numbers will be fine for a European no-peek game, with one adjustment: Ignore any index that has you doubling or splitting against a dealer ten or Ace.
In blackjack if you are dealt 5 cards under 21 do you automatically win the hand?
No. The “5-card Charlie” rule is not part of normal casino blackjack.
Read a book called ” Against the Gods”. It is a well documented book on the history of risk including casino games. One of the points that has stuck with me is………the longer you play blackjack the higher the percentage of losing comes your way. A good read.
Time is a factor in the equation. It helped me to understand why when you look on the faces of people at a blackjack table it is almost always the same.
What about if you count? Can the deep penetration in a single deck games make up for it?
With a large enough spread you can beat virtually any game. So yes, you could beat a 6:5 single deck game with counting. Just remember that you won’t have the edge at a 6:5 game until the true count reaches approximately +4. There are easier games to beat.
If your unit is $10, a 1-6 spread means betting from $10 to $60. Bet $10 at negative counts, zero counts, and probably at +1 also depending on the game. At +2 start ramping up until you reach your top bet of $60 at a true count of +5. There are a couple of lessons in the school that delve deeply into how to determine an optimal bet ramp. But as long as you stick to the simple approach I just described, you’ll be fine.
1-6 spread. Does that mean 10.00 for every true count? True 2,10,true 3,20,true4,30. Is that how you do the spread? Thanx for your time
BJ player.
Casino’s put out basic strategy cards because they know it will attract people to play. $1.50 for the card, $20, $40 sit at the table. Just because people have them doesn’t mean they will use them correctly. If they have a hunch or gut feeling or have seen lots of low or high cards come out, they will go with their gut and ignore the card. You just have to remember 2 things. 1. Don’t get mad. They’re only there for a bit of fun. 2 PLAY YOUR GAME. Their decision doesn’t effect your play. GL. a5teve.
This is silly. the same stupid moves those players make can easily benefit you. You just pay more attention to when these players hurt you then when they help you.
I hate people who complain about them.
I played in North Cyprus the last fortnight and the pros considered the Rocks to the best place to play. It is a fair game with a notch in the shoe to give a decent penetration. 75% even. There are 2 hand shuffle tables at $10 minimum and $25 minimum. These go up during the weekends to a $25 minimum.
If you play here you will be eligible to eat at the restaurant which has a very very decent buffet. The downside is the smoking but in North Cyprus this is the norm. Its worse in the Rocks because of its low ceilings. There are a lot of junkets that come here and the casino are playing to the tune. Counters are easily identified. The table maximum on the $10 table is $200 but its easily over come with a horizontal spread.
A minimal bankroll puts you in a tough spot. You cannot play a positive game without spreading at least 1 to 6 in a multi-deck game, but a top bet of $60 would mean you would usually lose whatever money you bring to the table because of short-term swings. If you are playing for fun, then budget whatever you can afford and spread minimally as you describe from $10 to $20. That is not much better than flat-betting, and perhaps flat-betting would be a better option. Either way your expectation is to lose a small percentage of your overall action. Be sure your basic strategy is solid. That will help.
When playing 10 a hand with no bankroll just paycheck to paycheck what should my spread be with each true count? If the true count is 3 should i bet 20.00 or less? Thanx for your time. Dont really understand the spread i should use
It sounds to me like you’ve just been luckier when practicing at home than when playing in the casino. As an example, I get complaints from players who use my strategy trainer here on the site… Some say “It must be rigged to be too easy. I win a ton!”, while others complain “It must be rigged to be too hard. I can’t ever win!”
Welcome to blackjack. It’s a bumpy ride.
There is no download for the trainer here. If your device is not compatible with Flash, the current version hosted here on this page will not work. I’m hoping to have a new mobile-friendly version available here in early 2016, with LOTS of new features. It’s in progress.