Ecco tutti i commenti pubblicati sul sito, con le discussioni più recenti elencate per prime.
Per partecipare a una qualsiasi di queste discussioni, potete rispondere nella pagina dell'articolo.
The article failed to mention caveats to overall strategy, and objective.
I’ll run a negative progression at times. Never by itself of course. That’s stupid. There are ways to MAKE the Casino THINK you’re running negative progression, and actually hide it in something else (No, I’m not giving away everything here).
Regardless, as with any mathematical game, you have to take into account strategy, and objective. Of course, this is taking into account that the individual is not a degen, and is actually going to “work” when they walk into the casino.
You run counting cards, and the rest of your strategy, and you’re up your target amount, plus a little spill over your target. Here … I’ll give you one for free.
Take that SPILL ONLY (and sometimes, if you want every dealer to be in love with you until the end of time, the tip amount) and run your strategy on a strict Martingale. You’ve already made your money. So just run the spill, down to a predetermined kill arena, but run strict negative progression until you hit the new target, or your kill spot is hit.
You __ MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT STRATEGY SPECIFICS __ before throwing around “never’s” and “Dont event think about” ‘s
Blackjack is actually a simple game to beat, with even a rudimentary understanding of differential mathematics; which in my opinion, they should be teaching to 9 year olds.
The Cromwell has made a big push going the opposite direction. Almost entire retail floor is 3/2 shoe and pitch double deck. $10-$15mins normally from what I’ve seen. Maybe up to $25 on the pitch at times but that’s still better than the rest of the strip. Should check it out.
and extreme question based on W’s info and coroborating info found on the Internet and my simultated
the player is holding a hard 14. If the dealer up-card is a 5, the dealers bust out rate would be 41.841%
inferring the dealers success rate would be 60.590%. By standing we accept the dealers bust rate of 41.841% as our success rate, however, based on the above charts i would hit the 14 a minimum 44.068% of making my hand.
44.068% SUCCESS rate is greater than 41.841% offered by conventional wisdom. Am I missing something
if so what or have we all been successfully conditioned to lose by the man.
i pulled 1, 2 and 3 from the respective websites and 3 came from this forum:KenSmith
my data came from my personal simulator.
i hope the above makes sense
You will also frequently hit and not bust, but still lose to a better dealer hand. Your question appears to assume that if you don’t bust, you’ll win the hand. No, you might win, you might lose, and you might push.
By the way, I’m checking in here less and less frequently since I am no longer associated with the site. I recommend that you take your questions to the forums if you want a better chance of getting a response.
Hmm it seems like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying
your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing.
Do you have any tips and hints for newbie blog writers?
I’d definitely appreciate it.
Mobile version of Blackjack strategy trainer. Rules: 1 Deck, Dealer hits soft 17, Double any card, No double after split, Never offer insurance. Had pair of 4s against dealer 5, tried to double as your basic strategy chart recommends, but got message that basic strategy was to split. On another occasion had Ace/7 against dealer Ace, tried to hit as your basic strategy chart recommends, but got message that basic strategy was to stand. Also, would it be possible to have a $1 wager increment and $2000 max bet option.
Sono stato segnalato al Borgata quasi dieci anni fa e poi al Caesars. Ad oggi ho giocato nella maggior parte delle sedi principali e non sono mai stato scortato fuori. Anche se ci sono "liste" in tutto il paese, alcuni casinò non sono così "stretti" come altri. Un esempio perfetto sono i casinò tribali del CT. Ho trascorso 9 mesi in uno di questi casinò per fare un po' di pratica e li ho presi per 250.000 dollari. Inoltre, i loro comps all'epoca erano ottimi. Sapevo che c'erano momenti in cui venivo messo sotto, quindi me la sono presa comoda. Oltre alla disciplina del tracking, dovreste sempre prendere in considerazione le scommesse unitarie, che vi aiuteranno a mascherare il vostro vantaggio.
no, se il giocatore ha superato il 21 ha buscato la mano e quindi ha perso. Il croupier deve ritirare le proprie fiche se il giocatore ha bustato (superando il 21). Nel vostro caso, colpendo 15 e pescando un asso si ottiene 16, che non è un over 21. L'obiettivo del blackjack è quello di non fare busting ma di avvicinarsi il più possibile a 21. Le probabilità di fare 16 sono maggiori, dato che avete solo 16% di possibilità di prendere le vostre carte. Questo dipende anche dal numero di carte alte giocate. Il maggior numero di carte alte giocate aumenta le probabilità di fare meglio. Il 16 nel blackjack è di solito una mano di resa, ma alcuni casinò non permettono la resa. In questo caso, la scelta migliore è quella di rimanere o colpire.
Yes! very much agree with this. I was playing and did something against the rules. this one guy mentioned it, and kept mentioning it, a couple of hands later. as if to say that my 1 decision affected his cards 2-3 hands later. but there were many other events that transpired after my choice to not play the rules. I believe in situational advantages and, in general, play by “the rules.” but to say that my not affects multiple events thereafter is delusional.
The article failed to mention caveats to overall strategy, and objective.
I’ll run a negative progression at times. Never by itself of course. That’s stupid. There are ways to MAKE the Casino THINK you’re running negative progression, and actually hide it in something else (No, I’m not giving away everything here).
Regardless, as with any mathematical game, you have to take into account strategy, and objective. Of course, this is taking into account that the individual is not a degen, and is actually going to “work” when they walk into the casino.
You run counting cards, and the rest of your strategy, and you’re up your target amount, plus a little spill over your target. Here … I’ll give you one for free.
Take that SPILL ONLY (and sometimes, if you want every dealer to be in love with you until the end of time, the tip amount) and run your strategy on a strict Martingale. You’ve already made your money. So just run the spill, down to a predetermined kill arena, but run strict negative progression until you hit the new target, or your kill spot is hit.
You __ MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT STRATEGY SPECIFICS __ before throwing around “never’s” and “Dont event think about” ‘s
Blackjack is actually a simple game to beat, with even a rudimentary understanding of differential mathematics; which in my opinion, they should be teaching to 9 year olds.
The Cromwell has made a big push going the opposite direction. Almost entire retail floor is 3/2 shoe and pitch double deck. $10-$15mins normally from what I’ve seen. Maybe up to $25 on the pitch at times but that’s still better than the rest of the strip. Should check it out.
kind of on topic
player 12 through to 16 refer to my chart
6 Decks Dealer Stands on Soft 17 Excerpt From
DEALER’S W* of O*’s DEALER’S FINAL TOTAL MY SIMULATOR
UP CARD BUST SUCCESS BUST SUCCESS
2 35.350% 64.650% 38.095% 61.905%
3 37.419% 62.581% 38.849% 61.151%
4 39.410% 60.590% 39.410% 60.590%
5 41.841% 58.159% 40.183% 59.817%
6 42.284% 57.716% 45.152% 54.848%
PLAYER’S BUST SUCCESS BUST SUCCESS BUST SUCCESS
12 31.000% 1 69.000% 52.755% 47.245% 46.200% 3 53.800%
13 39.000% 1 61.000% 53.822% 46.178% 50.900% 3 49.100%
14 47.000% 1 53.000% 55.932% 44.068% 55.000% 3 45.000%
15 58.000% 2 42.000% 59.772% 40.228% 58.600% 3 41.400%
16 62.000% 2 38.000% 59.834% 40.166% 61.500% 3 38.500%
Hit or Stand 1
lolblackjack 2
blackjackinfo 3
and extreme question based on W’s info and coroborating info found on the Internet and my simultated
the player is holding a hard 14. If the dealer up-card is a 5, the dealers bust out rate would be 41.841%
inferring the dealers success rate would be 60.590%. By standing we accept the dealers bust rate of 41.841% as our success rate, however, based on the above charts i would hit the 14 a minimum 44.068% of making my hand.
44.068% SUCCESS rate is greater than 41.841% offered by conventional wisdom. Am I missing something
if so what or have we all been successfully conditioned to lose by the man.
i pulled 1, 2 and 3 from the respective websites and 3 came from this forum:KenSmith
my data came from my personal simulator.
i hope the above makes sense
sorry it was formatted properly when i posted it.
You will also frequently hit and not bust, but still lose to a better dealer hand. Your question appears to assume that if you don’t bust, you’ll win the hand. No, you might win, you might lose, and you might push.
By the way, I’m checking in here less and less frequently since I am no longer associated with the site. I recommend that you take your questions to the forums if you want a better chance of getting a response.
actually my MINE includes the
Wins, Ties, Losses on a made hand, and busting out
i just used the results of the other websites to make
the point
grazie
Hmm it seems like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying
your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing.
Do you have any tips and hints for newbie blog writers?
I’d definitely appreciate it.
The “quit ” button is not working.
Thhis is a topic that is close to my heart… Thank you!
Where aｒe ʏour contact details thoսgh?
Un Black Jack e una Regina rossa sono un Blackjack?
I’d like to have the option to mute the sounds so i can play without disturbing my sleeping significant other….
Try turning down the volume on your device.
Do not like that strategy trainer can be turned off. Would like to see what I learned.
Mobile version of Blackjack strategy trainer. Rules: 1 Deck, Dealer hits soft 17, Double any card, No double after split, Never offer insurance. Had pair of 4s against dealer 5, tried to double as your basic strategy chart recommends, but got message that basic strategy was to split. On another occasion had Ace/7 against dealer Ace, tried to hit as your basic strategy chart recommends, but got message that basic strategy was to stand. Also, would it be possible to have a $1 wager increment and $2000 max bet option.
I enjoy reading and trying to learn all I can about blackjack, how do I start free blackjack School
Tournament play, common practice to split 10’s.
Tournament play V regular table play, splitting 10’s a common play.
Sono stato segnalato al Borgata quasi dieci anni fa e poi al Caesars. Ad oggi ho giocato nella maggior parte delle sedi principali e non sono mai stato scortato fuori. Anche se ci sono "liste" in tutto il paese, alcuni casinò non sono così "stretti" come altri. Un esempio perfetto sono i casinò tribali del CT. Ho trascorso 9 mesi in uno di questi casinò per fare un po' di pratica e li ho presi per 250.000 dollari. Inoltre, i loro comps all'epoca erano ottimi. Sapevo che c'erano momenti in cui venivo messo sotto, quindi me la sono presa comoda. Oltre alla disciplina del tracking, dovreste sempre prendere in considerazione le scommesse unitarie, che vi aiuteranno a mascherare il vostro vantaggio.
no, se il giocatore ha superato il 21 ha buscato la mano e quindi ha perso. Il croupier deve ritirare le proprie fiche se il giocatore ha bustato (superando il 21). Nel vostro caso, colpendo 15 e pescando un asso si ottiene 16, che non è un over 21. L'obiettivo del blackjack è quello di non fare busting ma di avvicinarsi il più possibile a 21. Le probabilità di fare 16 sono maggiori, dato che avete solo 16% di possibilità di prendere le vostre carte. Questo dipende anche dal numero di carte alte giocate. Il maggior numero di carte alte giocate aumenta le probabilità di fare meglio. Il 16 nel blackjack è di solito una mano di resa, ma alcuni casinò non permettono la resa. In questo caso, la scelta migliore è quella di rimanere o colpire.
Yes! very much agree with this. I was playing and did something against the rules. this one guy mentioned it, and kept mentioning it, a couple of hands later. as if to say that my 1 decision affected his cards 2-3 hands later. but there were many other events that transpired after my choice to not play the rules. I believe in situational advantages and, in general, play by “the rules.” but to say that my not affects multiple events thereafter is delusional.