You should stick with basic card counting for a while...BillytheBJkid said:how can I lear about shuffle tracking. what good books?
What i am saying is that a game perceived by you as a rubbish game is not perceived by others as a rubbish game.1357111317 said:I don't understand what you mean here? If you are implying that the game I am talking about is good then you are wrong as it is an awful game.
I'm sorry BJQ - i'm just not buying your act.BJQueen said:What i am saying is that a game perceived by you as a rubbish game is not perceived by others as a rubbish game.
There are many factors that you quite obviously have not considered in your determination that the game is not beatable.
I am not wrong.
I just see things from a different "Angle" than you do.
thats all![]()
Alright well lets see BJQueen. The score on a only play positve counts game is like 20. Counting is out. The shuffle is absoloutly unbeatable. The cards are so diluted its crazy. Shuffle tracking is out. There is no holecard. Holecarding is out. Decks are stripped, ace sequencing is out. I guess you could straight up steal the chips. Pretty big advantage there.BJQueen said:What i am saying is that a game perceived by you as a rubbish game is not perceived by others as a rubbish game.
There are many factors that you quite obviously have not considered in your determination that the game is not beatable.
I am not wrong.
I just see things from a different "Angle" than you do.
thats all![]()
LOL, i think i am going to stick to wonging then:sad:1357111317 said:Alright well lets see BJQueen. The score on a only play positve counts game is like 20. Counting is out. The shuffle is absoloutly unbeatable. The cards are so diluted its crazy. Shuffle tracking is out. There is no holecard. Holecarding is out. Decks are stripped, ace sequencing is out. I guess you could straight up steal the chips. Pretty big advantage there.
Sorry, but that responce gets you the title of faker. I've had the honor of speaking to many very tallented AP from many different groups and they can all talk a good game as well a play - you can't even talk it.BJQueen said:The problem you have is that you stick to what you know. you are blind-sighted to what you have read or what you perceive.
As i have said, quite openly, you are way off the mark.
good cards!
Okay Queen enough is enough here. This shuffle is not only largely a waste of time as far as gaining any sizeable advantage, it is not even performed with the true dexterity or precision of the casino from which it comes from. The dealer in the video is obviously confused and hesitant in performing the shuffle and does not perform it in a professional manner enough where I would even consider picking apart the potential of it. There are plenty of cards being flashed and indecision in where the stacks are placed. If I was to base my evaluation on what I see in the video I'm sure I would be in for a rude awakening once I took this info to the casino and realized its worthless. No insult to the video maker it was an honest attempt at trying to learn something and possibly gain an advantage, but if someone approached me with this type of take on a shuffle I wouldn't even bother to analyze it. I will say with a glance at the basic mechanics of it however, I wouldn't waste too much time on it anyway, its not a shuffle set up for any real sizeable advantages.BJQueen said:What i am saying is that a game perceived by you as a rubbish game is not perceived by others as a rubbish game.
There are many factors that you quite obviously have not considered in your determination that the game is not beatable.
I am not wrong.
I just see things from a different "Angle" than you do.
thats all![]()
Ace tracking is possible. There are many better shuffles for that practice.taipafan said:Half of the cards are only 2 passes, ace tracking is profitable.
Bojack1 said:Okay Queen enough is enough here. This shuffle is not only largely a waste of time as far as gaining any sizeable advantage, it is not even performed with the true dexterity or precision of the casino from which it comes from. The dealer in the video is obviously confused and hesitant in performing the shuffle and does not perform it in a professional manner enough where I would even consider picking apart the potential of it. There are plenty of cards being flashed and indecision in where the stacks are placed. If I was to base my evaluation on what I see in the video I'm sure I would be in for a rude awakening once I took this info to the casino and realized its worthless. No insult to the video maker it was an honest attempt at trying to learn something and possibly gain an advantage, but if someone approached me with this type of take on a shuffle I wouldn't even bother to analyze it. I will say with a glance at the basic mechanics of it however, I wouldn't waste too much time on it anyway, its not a shuffle set up for any real sizeable advantages.