UncrownedKing
Well-Known Member
I wasn't criticizing your numbers, I was asking why most fall short. So I know what to expect when I eventually get to the battlefield.
Flash, how much higher than 99% can you get? (as in your line #2)FLASH1296 said:Uncrowned KIng asked what is the reason for the 99% failure rate that I stated.
Firstly, I imagine that it is much higher than 99%.
Every year hundreds of thousands of people read a book or two and/or they
troll sites such as these in a futile attempt to "make it" as C.C.'s
They all imagine that it is all as simple as what they have read.
Being a serious card counter is heavily nuanced. There are quite
a lot of subtleties that it takes a lot of experience to even begin to appreciate.
Author's of books cannot expect to stifle the sales of their own books
by telling you on page one that you are unlikely to do anything other
than lose your money whilst becoming disillusioned and frustrated with BJ.
But that is the reality of the endeavor.
It takes extreme dedication, fine emotional equanimity, a detached attitude regarding money,
a willingness to be an "outlaw", [that is to live a rather unconventional life], a huge bankroll, etc.
The "bottom line", as it were, is that if one expects to be a weekend warrior and "crush" the game,
it aint goin' to happen; at least not over the long run.
Forewarned is forearmed.
I agree completely. Many, many people underestimate the bankroll swings they need to tolerate, and overestimate their hourly winning potential. But even out of the ones who would be (or are) otherwise very successful in BJ, I'm sure plenty just get bored with it and choose to do more productive (and profitable) things. So there aren't many left.Martin Gayle said:I would concur that most are out by the time they are 30. 99% is just a number but it seems like a good one. Don't be discouraged I don't think 99% fail but they just move on. They have jobs, families, new hobbies etc. Because they move on in life I wouldn't call them failed card counters, they just retire, early.
I am not one to support Flash's hyperbole but I will play with this one.Katweezel said:Flash, how much higher than 99% can you get? (as in your line #2)
Just when many (younger people) have digested the illusions of cardcounting portrayed in the movie '21', you come along with the dismal truth of the matter.
I suspect that a 'much higher than 99%' proportion who read the dismal truth, will reject it in favor of more glamorous, more exciting and more enticing
ideas. Ideas that don't look like so much hard work, dedication and effort. :cat:
It may have been Rainman's card counting that finally flipped Tom Cruise into believing in aliens and scientology. My wife thinks I'm heading the same way. :cat:Martin Gayle said:I am not one to support Flash's hyperbole but I will play with this one.
Picture this. On 8 Apr 1979 a young Flash reads BtheD and is inspired to be a card counter. 500 other people across America look into beating the casinos card counting...how many do you think are still working? How many 21 year old's who have seen "21" will still be counting cards at 60?
I like to consider AP an Urban Legend. Everyone knows someone who does it but has never seen it happen. Popular media has caused highs and lows in people who want to BtheD. Think of Rain Man. The Vegas scene is farcical but think about what it must have done for autistics wanting to crush the MGM.
Yes they pull up all avialable information from any sister properties also. They will back the tape up and see the play.jimbiggs said:Questions for Mr. M.
When the pit crew or surveliance gets suspicious, do they pull up a rated player's history? Will they look at information on his player's card? Is this information used to determine a barring? Or do they just go by evaluating actual play? What if the player leaves during the evaluation? Do they back up the tapes to evaluate the entire playing session?
If a counter walked into a casino where he was barred from playing blackjack, and picked up a random player's card left in a slot machine, used it to play blackjack at the tables, would casino personnel notice? Maybe by checking the DOB on the card and comparing it with how old the player looks? Would there be consequences?
ohbehave said:Mr. M... there have been discussions on this board concerning the practice of ratholing of chips. It is of my opinion that ratholing is essential for the card counter to show a lifetime loss. This is a top concern as far as table play goes, would you agree, to make sure that regular players are not lifetime winners?
My question is if there are any measures in place to root out players who rathole black chips (or higher)? If say a player can rathole without being observed in the action of doing so can the pit pin ratholing of black chips to a player just by tracking their action?
Someone posted somewhere (maybe not even on this board, I can't remember) that ratholing blacks will cause more trouble than it's worth; they recommend ratholing greens, max.ohbehave said:any measures in place to root out players who rathole black chips (or higher)?
Right, I've read that too. This is merely hypothetical for me since I'm still a green chipper. Seems it would be difficult to rathole enough greens at black minimum to make a difference.callipygian said:Someone posted somewhere (maybe not even on this board, I can't remember) that ratholing blacks will cause more trouble than it's worth; they recommend ratholing greens, max.
IIRC the exact suggestion was to bet non-round amounts (e.g. $105 or $175) in an effort to get a massive pile of multicolored chips in front of you; the blacks will be watched but not the greens or reds.
Mr.M said:Yes they pull up all avialable information from any sister properties also. They will back the tape up and see the play.
They will notice only if they reckonize you, they cant do anything but ask you to leave again.