same here i guess. i mean i just had a hunch it could be dicey. lol. it's like it would take some tremendous trust with business partners or friends. could it would seem put a real test to friendship lol.Canceler said:
i think to make the parameters simpiler for Kasi's bjinfoteam spread sheet.Canceler said:
Canceler said:Good thing I'm earning great comps for all this action! I am, right?
zengrifter said:
i'm your age and i'm still trying to figure out what my life is all about. but that doesn't mean i think it's voodoo or meaningless lol. but then again it might be.I was doubtful about the point of this at the beginning. Even so, I spent a week building my own software so I could participate. Now I’ve played almost 14,000 hands, and am actually down a few imaginary dollars. And for what?zengrifter said:
It’s good counting practice. And even though we’re supposed to be a team, there’s still a small element of competition, which makes it fun.
i like your points Canceler. and like you say Kasi's spreadsheet is really something. like looking at it below we can have an idea of our N0. so it's what about 44,000 rounds. and here we are already about 30,000 hands or so. i mean yeah zen's got a point about all this meaningless data. thing is won't be long we'll approach reaching our N0 as a team. that figure has some significance. so it's like to me a history of what happened on the way to the magical land of N0 lol. hey what we're doing shows what happended on the way that's something darned hard for a card counter to see, know and experience after years or so of playing in a real casino. at the very least it give one an idea of all the things going on shrouded by time, lack of memory or ability to record what happended in real play.Canceler said:I was doubtful about the point of this at the beginning. Even so, I spent a week building my own software so I could participate. Now I’ve played almost 14,000 hands, and am actually down a few imaginary dollars. And for what?
The main thing is that it led to me getting Kasi's spreadsheet, which, for me, was huge. And it is interesting to see the differences in our results. Sagefr0g is 60K ahead, and I have a small loss, even though we’re playing the same game. (Well, Mr. Fr0g is using HiLo, and I’m using KO, but that’s no big deal.)
There may be some educational value for others. Maybe some new counter, who thinks he’s on the road to riches, will see my charts and realize that even with a 1-24 spread, zero heat, and proper play (like a good little robot), you can still have results that suck for a long, long time.
So why keep playing? Right now I’m shooting for achieving a respectable result. Or maybe I’ll end up illustrating 3 or 4 SDs on the wrong side of the curve.
.Canceler said:
ohh, ohh jj's on my trail..... time to flip again.jack said:
i'm a contradiction in terms but you know it a'int easy bein green:aslan said:
That made me wonder about the whole aspect of actually running a team lol.Canceler said:
:angel:
somebody let Kasi off the bench!Kasi said:
![swaggartpointing[1].jpg](/community/data/attachments/0/260-8cee34b228983cc80a3fb17988f1350b.jpg)
Good catch Wise One. If your team sheet has the CVCX sims, one for exact card TC calculation and one for full deck estimation TC, the columns labeled variance are mis-labeled. They are really SD since that's what CVCX does and of course are labeled as such in his sims. Likewise for Don's tables since CVCX produced them lol.sagefr0g said:
