Ecco tutti i commenti pubblicati sul sito, con le discussioni più recenti elencate per prime.
Per partecipare a una qualsiasi di queste discussioni, potete rispondere nella pagina dell'articolo.
Il GameMaster ha originariamente utilizzato queste lezioni in un corso settimanale, quindi una lezione alla settimana è un piano ragionevole. Tuttavia, dal momento che il materiale varia ampiamente nella sua ampiezza lezione per lezione, potete facilmente adattare il programma ai vostri progressi.
can I just ask something here, you say that johnny clueless doesnt have an impact in the long run, so how to you explan your matsmatics to the guy who playing his last $2000 on his last hand and johnny takes the dealers bust card? i would love to hear you explain this to me? my emai is [email protected] I await your caculated answer.
I think this has been answered often enough in the comments on this thread. But, being ever the optimist, I’ll make one more foray into it…
People who think that third base can effect their chances are basically espousing this belief: “If the dealer gets the next card off the deck, all is well, but if the dealer gets the second card off the deck instead (after third base takes a card), the dealer is more likely to beat the whole table.” Surely when I state it that way you can see that this is nonsense. If not, well, just believe whatever you like and we’ll leave it at that.
Vorrei un aiuto per il mio ragionamento sull'effetto della carta tagliata nel gioco della scarpa. Sono abituato a giocare una partita a scarpa utilizzando otto mazzi, con la carta tagliata posizionata a circa tre mazzi dalla fine, quindi vengono distribuiti solo cinque degli otto mazzi.
Mi sembra che con questa configurazione la carta tagliata aiuti i giocatori. Se la parte anteriore della scarpa è ricca di carte alte, vengono distribuite più mani. Se è ricca di carte basse, vengono distribuite meno mani. Pertanto, i giocatori possono giocare più mani quando la scarpa è favorevole e meno mani quando è sfavorevole. Pertanto, con una penetrazione di soli cinque mazzi in una scarpa di otto mazzi, sembra che la carta tagliata avvantaggi il giocatore di strategia di base.
Ecco un'ottima pagina sull'effetto del cartoncino tagliato e sul suo impatto: https://www.blackjackincolor.com/blackjackeffects1.htm
Capisco che la tua versione sembri plausibile, ma non è esattamente ciò che accade. Se la parte anteriore della scarpa è ricca di carte alte, è più probabile che dobbiate giocare una o due mani in più dopo che tutte le carte buone sono già sparite.
Si noti che l'effetto non dipende da una particolare penetrazione. Esiste ogni volta che il gioco utilizza un punto di mescolanza fisso.
Thanks for creating this great website and I like the discussion here as well.
my local casinos use machine shuffle for all $5 min tables(shuffle ever one deck), hand shuffle for $10 min tables.
I have to sit at $10 table if I am going to counting,but if I only have $1,000 bankroll, do your have some strategy for the people who don’t have enough bankroll to play? or should I wait until I get $10,000 bankroll?
I answered a similar question recently here: https://www.blackjackinfo.com/blackjack-school/lesson-08-money-management-part-2/#comment-23543
The idea of taking a shot with a too-small bankroll is often referred to as a “Hail Mary” bankroll. If you are willing to accept the risk of losing it all and then having to raise another bank, it’s a viable plan. Just don’t get yourself into a situation where you don’t have enough bankroll left to split and double appropriately.
Mr. Ryan
I love to hear from Ken about your question. But I will give you my two cents worth of opinion. It’s just back luck!! Johnny can took away the good card from dealer and make you win that hand too. Then you will be $2000 ahead. Then you should quit going to casino forever, so that you will be ahead $2000 , because that will be your last hand playing blackjack. Good luck!
Ciao Ken,
I dont get it 12 vs. 5 stand at – 1 or higher what i understand too many cards in the decks so i need to hit again is that the correct move? And what why is it -1 count is higher than -3 or above?thanks
Just to describe it more fully… With 12v5, if the true count is worse than -1, you should hit. That means at negative true counts such as -2 or -3, you should hit. The negative count is telling you that there are excess small cards left, decreasing the chance that you will bust by hitting, and also decreasing the chance that the dealer will bust. At a true count of -1 or better (-1, 0, +1, etc), you should stand. Note that this corresponds with basic strategy, which says to stand with 12v5.
You also asked “Why is it -1 count is higher than -3 or above?” If I understand the question correctly, just think back to the number line in school where you probably first saw negative numbers… -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +5. So yes, -1 is higher than -3.
I recently had some feedback from “Orso LV” suggesting that using the terms “better” or “worse”, would be less confusing for some readers than “higher” or “lower”. I agree. If I revamp the GameMaster’s lessons, I will likely make that switch.
I have another question, I just find out that in your lesson 20 you play $10 min with a $3,000 bankroll. does $3,000 bankroll can be enough for all the loss in one session if I can count and play properly with 1-6 spread ? do I have to take $3,000 cash in my pocket when I am going to play?(silly question for sure but like to know) Thanks,
Ive been playing on your trainer web getting ready to go to the casino. I noticed that amount won many times is not added to the total. I thoutht maybe I was making a mistake but after careful watching of several hundred hands I confirmed that to be the case. Kind of makes me wonder if the rest of the software has a problem.
Check it out and let me know what gives. Great website otherwise.
No, there is no problem with the paying of winning hands in the free game. The confusion comes from the way that your balance increases after the hand, and then immediately decreases again as the next bet is automatically made. Many people only notice the second part and think their balance is going down after a winning hand.
Ciao Ken
Il mio casinò qui ha le regole per il blackjack: 6 mazzi, CSM, D qualsiasi 2 carte, DAS, soft 17, resa anticipata, nessun picco, ma nessuna resa se il banchiere ha A . Il vostro motore di strategia di base dice che il banco ha un vantaggio di -.08%. Ciò significa che il giocatore ha .08% contro il banco?
Grazie.
Se la resa anticipata fosse completa, anche contro un Asso, sarebbe corretta. Il giocatore avrebbe un piccolo vantaggio.
Tuttavia, poiché non è possibile arrendersi contro un Asso, questo aggiunge circa 0,4% al margine della casa, quindi il totale effettivo è un vantaggio della casa di circa 0,32%.
Con quale frequenza dobbiamo passare alla lezione successiva?
Il GameMaster ha originariamente utilizzato queste lezioni in un corso settimanale, quindi una lezione alla settimana è un piano ragionevole. Tuttavia, dal momento che il materiale varia ampiamente nella sua ampiezza lezione per lezione, potete facilmente adattare il programma ai vostri progressi.
can I just ask something here, you say that johnny clueless doesnt have an impact in the long run, so how to you explan your matsmatics to the guy who playing his last $2000 on his last hand and johnny takes the dealers bust card? i would love to hear you explain this to me? my emai is [email protected] I await your caculated answer.
I think this has been answered often enough in the comments on this thread. But, being ever the optimist, I’ll make one more foray into it…
People who think that third base can effect their chances are basically espousing this belief: “If the dealer gets the next card off the deck, all is well, but if the dealer gets the second card off the deck instead (after third base takes a card), the dealer is more likely to beat the whole table.” Surely when I state it that way you can see that this is nonsense. If not, well, just believe whatever you like and we’ll leave it at that.
Vorrei un aiuto per il mio ragionamento sull'effetto della carta tagliata nel gioco della scarpa. Sono abituato a giocare una partita a scarpa utilizzando otto mazzi, con la carta tagliata posizionata a circa tre mazzi dalla fine, quindi vengono distribuiti solo cinque degli otto mazzi.
Mi sembra che con questa configurazione la carta tagliata aiuti i giocatori. Se la parte anteriore della scarpa è ricca di carte alte, vengono distribuite più mani. Se è ricca di carte basse, vengono distribuite meno mani. Pertanto, i giocatori possono giocare più mani quando la scarpa è favorevole e meno mani quando è sfavorevole. Pertanto, con una penetrazione di soli cinque mazzi in una scarpa di otto mazzi, sembra che la carta tagliata avvantaggi il giocatore di strategia di base.
Mi sfugge qualcosa?
Ecco un'ottima pagina sull'effetto del cartoncino tagliato e sul suo impatto:
https://www.blackjackincolor.com/blackjackeffects1.htm
Capisco che la tua versione sembri plausibile, ma non è esattamente ciò che accade. Se la parte anteriore della scarpa è ricca di carte alte, è più probabile che dobbiate giocare una o due mani in più dopo che tutte le carte buone sono già sparite.
Si noti che l'effetto non dipende da una particolare penetrazione. Esiste ogni volta che il gioco utilizza un punto di mescolanza fisso.
Ciao Ken,
Thanks for creating this great website and I like the discussion here as well.
my local casinos use machine shuffle for all $5 min tables(shuffle ever one deck), hand shuffle for $10 min tables.
I have to sit at $10 table if I am going to counting,but if I only have $1,000 bankroll, do your have some strategy for the people who don’t have enough bankroll to play? or should I wait until I get $10,000 bankroll?
I answered a similar question recently here:
https://www.blackjackinfo.com/blackjack-school/lesson-08-money-management-part-2/#comment-23543
The idea of taking a shot with a too-small bankroll is often referred to as a “Hail Mary” bankroll. If you are willing to accept the risk of losing it all and then having to raise another bank, it’s a viable plan. Just don’t get yourself into a situation where you don’t have enough bankroll left to split and double appropriately.
Mr. Ryan
I love to hear from Ken about your question. But I will give you my two cents worth of opinion. It’s just back luck!! Johnny can took away the good card from dealer and make you win that hand too. Then you will be $2000 ahead. Then you should quit going to casino forever, so that you will be ahead $2000 , because that will be your last hand playing blackjack. Good luck!
Ciao Ken,
I dont get it 12 vs. 5 stand at – 1 or higher what i understand too many cards in the decks so i need to hit again is that the correct move? And what why is it -1 count is higher than -3 or above?thanks
Just to describe it more fully… With 12v5, if the true count is worse than -1, you should hit. That means at negative true counts such as -2 or -3, you should hit. The negative count is telling you that there are excess small cards left, decreasing the chance that you will bust by hitting, and also decreasing the chance that the dealer will bust. At a true count of -1 or better (-1, 0, +1, etc), you should stand. Note that this corresponds with basic strategy, which says to stand with 12v5.
You also asked “Why is it -1 count is higher than -3 or above?” If I understand the question correctly, just think back to the number line in school where you probably first saw negative numbers… -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +5. So yes, -1 is higher than -3.
I recently had some feedback from “Orso LV” suggesting that using the terms “better” or “worse”, would be less confusing for some readers than “higher” or “lower”. I agree. If I revamp the GameMaster’s lessons, I will likely make that switch.
Thank you very much for your prompt replying.
I have another question, I just find out that in your lesson 20 you play $10 min with a $3,000 bankroll. does $3,000 bankroll can be enough for all the loss in one session if I can count and play properly with 1-6 spread ? do I have to take $3,000 cash in my pocket when I am going to play?(silly question for sure but like to know) Thanks,
You will not need $3000 in one session with a max bet of $60. I would recommend $1000.
Ive been playing on your trainer web getting ready to go to the casino. I noticed that amount won many times is not added to the total. I thoutht maybe I was making a mistake but after careful watching of several hundred hands I confirmed that to be the case. Kind of makes me wonder if the rest of the software has a problem.
Check it out and let me know what gives. Great website otherwise.
No, there is no problem with the paying of winning hands in the free game. The confusion comes from the way that your balance increases after the hand, and then immediately decreases again as the next bet is automatically made. Many people only notice the second part and think their balance is going down after a winning hand.
Ciao Ken
Il mio casinò qui ha le regole per il blackjack: 6 mazzi, CSM, D qualsiasi 2 carte, DAS, soft 17, resa anticipata, nessun picco, ma nessuna resa se il banchiere ha A . Il vostro motore di strategia di base dice che il banco ha un vantaggio di -.08%. Ciò significa che il giocatore ha .08% contro il banco?
Grazie.
Se la resa anticipata fosse completa, anche contro un Asso, sarebbe corretta. Il giocatore avrebbe un piccolo vantaggio.
Tuttavia, poiché non è possibile arrendersi contro un Asso, questo aggiunge circa 0,4% al margine della casa, quindi il totale effettivo è un vantaggio della casa di circa 0,32%.
Grazie signor Smith. Ora so perché sto ancora perdendo!!! Ha Ha !
Ciao Ken,
have a question. if i play only with positive counts (TC>=2), my bankroll could be smaller than 50 top bets adviced in this lesson?
totally agree. i had a guy hit on 19! yes 19! after me. i had $200 on that hand he had $20. this hand has put me off blackjack for life!