Here are all the comments posted on the site, with the most recent discussions listed first.
To participate in any of these discussions, you can reply on the article page.
Hallo Ken,
Why does it seems that I am very successful on your trainer, yet have a very difficult time winning on the wizard’s? If both are using RNG’s should they not be approximately the same. Assuming the same rules, BS, and betting pattern?
Luck.
I can’t wait until I launch the new version of the trainer. If prior history is repeated, I will be inundated with emails asking why I made the game so much harder to beat, along with an equal number asking why I made it so much easier to beat!
Hallo, wenn der optimale Einsatz beim Schuhspiel für eine einzelne Hand 76% des Spielervorteils beträgt, wie viel Geld sollte man dann für 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Hände setzen?
Gilt die Basisstrategie nur für Ihr erstes Blatt? Ändert sie sich oder bleibt sie gleich, wenn man auf einem Blatt mit 3, 4 oder 5+ Karten sitzt? Nehmen wir an, ich habe 7 (5, 2) gegen die 9 des Dealers, ich treffe, die 5 kommt raus, jetzt sitze ich auf der 12 (5, 2, 5), folge ich immer noch BS? Eine 12 gegen 9 schlagen? Ich treffe, 4 kommt raus, jetzt sitze ich auf 16 (5, 2, 5, 4) gegen Geber 9. BS sagt, ich soll wieder schlagen... Meine Frage ist also: Ändert sich BS, wenn Sie solche Hände haben? Oder spielen Sie immer BS, egal wie viele Karten Sie auf der Hand haben? (ignorieren wir einfach die Variation beim Zählen, ich meine nur den echten BS)
Die Ratschläge der Basisstrategie zum Schlagen und Stehen gelten unabhängig davon, wie viele Karten Sie auf der Hand haben. Teilen, Verdoppeln und Aufgeben sind nur bei Zwei-Karten-Blättern möglich und stellen daher einen Sonderfall dar. Verwenden Sie einfach Ihr gesamtes Blatt, um die richtige Entscheidung nachzuschlagen.
I read the following in the Casino Verite Software: “A perfect side count for Insurance purposes would count Tens as -9 and all other cards as +4”. But it doesn’t explain how to use this indicator. Can you help me with this?
It’s easy to see why this is a perfect count for insurance, but to use it you would need to determine the correct starting count for each number of decks. I’ll instead refer you to QFIT’s page that discusses it and recommends a much more practical unbalanced count from Wong. Here’s the reference: https://www.qfit.com/blackjack-side-counts.htm
Thank you for the reference. It is very interesting.
There you can find: “Tens are counted as -2 and all other cards as +1. Insure if the count is greater than four times the number of decks”.
Questions:
1) when he said the count it means the running count?
2) when he said the number of decks is the remaing decks in the shoe or the total decks of the game?
1) Yes, use the running count for the decision. (This works because of the unbalanced nature of the count.)
2) Base the index on the total number of decks in the game. In a six-deck game, insure at +24, regardless of how many decks have been dealt or remain to be dealt.
Ken, I just jumped on the trainer after a few months absence. Started reading the comments and noticed that you will be launching a revised version. Any idea of the approximate launch date? Looking forward to the new version. Thanks again for a great strategy trainer!
I was originally targeting June for a launch, but I’ve had a major life change interrupt development. I’m preparing to move my family from Mississippi to Texas, and that stopped development in its tracks over a month ago. I will resume development in August, so I now expect a launch in the fall at the earliest. So, it’s a long wait, but I think worth it.
the rules are 17s , early surrender alowed (except vs A) , and double down 9 , 10 , 11.Now the true count are -4 , 16 vs 10 , are that surrender or hit ? and are the basic strategy varation important for a “good” game ?.. for example split 10s never.. or ounly if the count are true count are (exampel) +5..etc.
The advanced cards do not include surrender indexes, to keep them manageable. So, given the advice on the card, you should surrender 16vT. If you cannot surrender, if the true count is 0 or better, you should stand. If it is negative, you should hit.
Now, I can add to that an additional piece of information. The “surrender index” for 16vT is -4. So, if the true count is -4 or better, you should surrender. If the true count is -5 or worse, you should just hit, even when surrender is allowed.
You ask how important strategy variations are to the game. Most of your edge comes from bet variation, and only about 1/4 of your edge comes from changing strategy. I always recommend getting completely comfortable counting with just basic strategy before you start to add index plays to your toolbox.
Splitting tens can be an appropriate play, but only if you know that the deck is rich (by counting cards.) You need something like a +6 adjusted count for this to be the case, and this doesn’t happen that often. So in general, splitting tens is not a good move.
Thank you, Ken. People who think that the bad play of others can somehow affect their outcomes in the long run deserve to lose their shirts. They don’t understand the game and therefore should just stay away, for their own good.
Hallo Ken,
Why does it seems that I am very successful on your trainer, yet have a very difficult time winning on the wizard’s? If both are using RNG’s should they not be approximately the same. Assuming the same rules, BS, and betting pattern?
Luck.
I can’t wait until I launch the new version of the trainer. If prior history is repeated, I will be inundated with emails asking why I made the game so much harder to beat, along with an equal number asking why I made it so much easier to beat!
Hallo, wenn der optimale Einsatz beim Schuhspiel für eine einzelne Hand 76% des Spielervorteils beträgt, wie viel Geld sollte man dann für 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Hände setzen?
Siehe die informative Antwort von Sonny in diesem Thema:
https://www.blackjackinfo.com/knowledge-base/blackjack-card-counting/one-big-bet-vs-two-hands/
Gilt die Basisstrategie nur für Ihr erstes Blatt? Ändert sie sich oder bleibt sie gleich, wenn man auf einem Blatt mit 3, 4 oder 5+ Karten sitzt? Nehmen wir an, ich habe 7 (5, 2) gegen die 9 des Dealers, ich treffe, die 5 kommt raus, jetzt sitze ich auf der 12 (5, 2, 5), folge ich immer noch BS? Eine 12 gegen 9 schlagen? Ich treffe, 4 kommt raus, jetzt sitze ich auf 16 (5, 2, 5, 4) gegen Geber 9. BS sagt, ich soll wieder schlagen... Meine Frage ist also: Ändert sich BS, wenn Sie solche Hände haben? Oder spielen Sie immer BS, egal wie viele Karten Sie auf der Hand haben? (ignorieren wir einfach die Variation beim Zählen, ich meine nur den echten BS)
Danke 🙂 .
Die Ratschläge der Basisstrategie zum Schlagen und Stehen gelten unabhängig davon, wie viele Karten Sie auf der Hand haben. Teilen, Verdoppeln und Aufgeben sind nur bei Zwei-Karten-Blättern möglich und stellen daher einen Sonderfall dar. Verwenden Sie einfach Ihr gesamtes Blatt, um die richtige Entscheidung nachzuschlagen.
Hallo Ken,
I read the following in the Casino Verite Software: “A perfect side count for Insurance purposes would count Tens as -9 and all other cards as +4”. But it doesn’t explain how to use this indicator. Can you help me with this?
Danke.
It’s easy to see why this is a perfect count for insurance, but to use it you would need to determine the correct starting count for each number of decks. I’ll instead refer you to QFIT’s page that discusses it and recommends a much more practical unbalanced count from Wong. Here’s the reference: https://www.qfit.com/blackjack-side-counts.htm
Thank you for the reference. It is very interesting.
There you can find: “Tens are counted as -2 and all other cards as +1. Insure if the count is greater than four times the number of decks”.
Questions:
1) when he said the count it means the running count?
2) when he said the number of decks is the remaing decks in the shoe or the total decks of the game?
Thank you in advance.
1) Yes, use the running count for the decision. (This works because of the unbalanced nature of the count.)
2) Base the index on the total number of decks in the game. In a six-deck game, insure at +24, regardless of how many decks have been dealt or remain to be dealt.
I know i m off topic but i don t know where to post.
I had a new idea to count down cards.
Is there anyone who can give me an help please?
my mail is federico.betti90 @ gmail.com
Ken, I just jumped on the trainer after a few months absence. Started reading the comments and noticed that you will be launching a revised version. Any idea of the approximate launch date? Looking forward to the new version. Thanks again for a great strategy trainer!
I was originally targeting June for a launch, but I’ve had a major life change interrupt development. I’m preparing to move my family from Mississippi to Texas, and that stopped development in its tracks over a month ago. I will resume development in August, so I now expect a launch in the fall at the earliest. So, it’s a long wait, but I think worth it.
the rules are 17s , early surrender alowed (except vs A) , and double down 9 , 10 , 11.Now the true count are -4 , 16 vs 10 , are that surrender or hit ? and are the basic strategy varation important for a “good” game ?.. for example split 10s never.. or ounly if the count are true count are (exampel) +5..etc.
The advanced cards do not include surrender indexes, to keep them manageable. So, given the advice on the card, you should surrender 16vT. If you cannot surrender, if the true count is 0 or better, you should stand. If it is negative, you should hit.
Now, I can add to that an additional piece of information. The “surrender index” for 16vT is -4. So, if the true count is -4 or better, you should surrender. If the true count is -5 or worse, you should just hit, even when surrender is allowed.
You ask how important strategy variations are to the game. Most of your edge comes from bet variation, and only about 1/4 of your edge comes from changing strategy. I always recommend getting completely comfortable counting with just basic strategy before you start to add index plays to your toolbox.
thanks for your answer !
i hope in a near future we can talk about startegy vaiations etc.
Splitting tens can be an appropriate play, but only if you know that the deck is rich (by counting cards.) You need something like a +6 adjusted count for this to be the case, and this doesn’t happen that often. So in general, splitting tens is not a good move.
Thank you, Ken. People who think that the bad play of others can somehow affect their outcomes in the long run deserve to lose their shirts. They don’t understand the game and therefore should just stay away, for their own good.
I dont think it can be explained any better sir
See Current Blackjack News at bj21.com