Hier finden Sie alle Kommentare, die auf der Website gepostet wurden, wobei die neuesten Diskussionen zuerst aufgeführt sind.
Wenn Sie sich an einer dieser Diskussionen beteiligen möchten, können Sie auf der Artikelseite antworten.
The GameMaster originally used these lessons in a weekly course, so one lesson a week is a reasonable plan. However, since the material varies widely in its breadth lesson by lesson, you can easily just adapt the schedule to your progress.
can I just ask something here, you say that johnny clueless doesnt have an impact in the long run, so how to you explan your matsmatics to the guy who playing his last $2000 on his last hand and johnny takes the dealers bust card? i would love to hear you explain this to me? my emai is [email protected] I await your caculated answer.
I think this has been answered often enough in the comments on this thread. But, being ever the optimist, I’ll make one more foray into it…
People who think that third base can effect their chances are basically espousing this belief: “If the dealer gets the next card off the deck, all is well, but if the dealer gets the second card off the deck instead (after third base takes a card), the dealer is more likely to beat the whole table.” Surely when I state it that way you can see that this is nonsense. If not, well, just believe whatever you like and we’ll leave it at that.
Ich bräuchte etwas Hilfe bei meinen Überlegungen zum Cut-Card-Effekt bei einem Schuhspiel. Ich bin es gewohnt, ein Shoe-Spiel mit acht Decks zu spielen, wobei die Cut-Karte etwa drei Decks vor dem Ende platziert wird, so dass nur fünf der acht Decks ausgegeben werden.
Ich habe den Eindruck, dass bei diesem System die Cut Card den Spielern hilft. Wenn die Vorderseite des Schuhs reich an hohen Karten ist, werden mehr Blätter ausgeteilt. Wenn er viele niedrige Karten enthält, werden weniger Blätter ausgeteilt. Daher können die Spieler mehr Hände spielen, wenn der Schuh günstig ist, und weniger Hände, wenn er ungünstig ist. Bei einer Penetration von nur fünf Kartendecks in einem Schuh mit acht Kartendecks sieht es also so aus, als ob die Cut Card den Spielern der Basisstrategie zugute kommt.
Hier ist eine großartige Seite über den Effekt der ausgeschnittenen Karten und die Auswirkungen, die er hat: https://www.blackjackincolor.com/blackjackeffects1.htm
Ich verstehe, warum Ihre Version plausibel klingt, aber das ist nicht ganz das, was passiert. Stellen Sie es sich stattdessen so vor... Wenn die Vorderseite des Schuhs reich an hohen Karten ist, ist es wahrscheinlicher, dass Sie eine oder zwei zusätzliche Hände spielen müssen, nachdem all diese guten Karten bereits weg sind.
Beachten Sie, dass der Effekt nicht von einer bestimmten Penetration abhängig ist. Er tritt immer dann auf, wenn das Spiel einen festen Mischungspunkt verwendet.
Thanks for creating this great website and I like the discussion here as well.
my local casinos use machine shuffle for all $5 min tables(shuffle ever one deck), hand shuffle for $10 min tables.
I have to sit at $10 table if I am going to counting,but if I only have $1,000 bankroll, do your have some strategy for the people who don’t have enough bankroll to play? or should I wait until I get $10,000 bankroll?
I answered a similar question recently here: https://www.blackjackinfo.com/blackjack-school/lesson-08-money-management-part-2/#comment-23543
The idea of taking a shot with a too-small bankroll is often referred to as a “Hail Mary” bankroll. If you are willing to accept the risk of losing it all and then having to raise another bank, it’s a viable plan. Just don’t get yourself into a situation where you don’t have enough bankroll left to split and double appropriately.
Mr. Ryan
I love to hear from Ken about your question. But I will give you my two cents worth of opinion. It’s just back luck!! Johnny can took away the good card from dealer and make you win that hand too. Then you will be $2000 ahead. Then you should quit going to casino forever, so that you will be ahead $2000 , because that will be your last hand playing blackjack. Good luck!
Hallo Ken,
I dont get it 12 vs. 5 stand at – 1 or higher what i understand too many cards in the decks so i need to hit again is that the correct move? And what why is it -1 count is higher than -3 or above?thanks
Just to describe it more fully… With 12v5, if the true count is worse than -1, you should hit. That means at negative true counts such as -2 or -3, you should hit. The negative count is telling you that there are excess small cards left, decreasing the chance that you will bust by hitting, and also decreasing the chance that the dealer will bust. At a true count of -1 or better (-1, 0, +1, etc), you should stand. Note that this corresponds with basic strategy, which says to stand with 12v5.
You also asked “Why is it -1 count is higher than -3 or above?” If I understand the question correctly, just think back to the number line in school where you probably first saw negative numbers… -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +5. So yes, -1 is higher than -3.
I recently had some feedback from “LV-Bär” suggesting that using the terms “better” or “worse”, would be less confusing for some readers than “higher” or “lower”. I agree. If I revamp the GameMaster’s lessons, I will likely make that switch.
I have another question, I just find out that in your lesson 20 you play $10 min with a $3,000 bankroll. does $3,000 bankroll can be enough for all the loss in one session if I can count and play properly with 1-6 spread ? do I have to take $3,000 cash in my pocket when I am going to play?(silly question for sure but like to know) Thanks,
Ive been playing on your trainer web getting ready to go to the casino. I noticed that amount won many times is not added to the total. I thoutht maybe I was making a mistake but after careful watching of several hundred hands I confirmed that to be the case. Kind of makes me wonder if the rest of the software has a problem.
Check it out and let me know what gives. Great website otherwise.
No, there is no problem with the paying of winning hands in the free game. The confusion comes from the way that your balance increases after the hand, and then immediately decreases again as the next bet is automatically made. Many people only notice the second part and think their balance is going down after a winning hand.
Hallo Ken
Mein Casino hier hat die Regeln für Blackjack: 6 Decks, CSM, D beliebige 2 Karten, DAS, weiche 17, frühe Übergabe, keine Spitze, aber keine Übergabe, wenn die Bank A hat. Ihre Basisstrategie-Engine sagt, dass der Bankier einen Vorteil von -.08% hat. Das bedeutet, dass der Spieler .08% gegen die Bank hat?
Danke.
Wenn Sie früh und vollständig aufgeben würden, auch gegen ein Ass, wäre das korrekt. Der Spieler würde einen kleinen Vorteil haben.
Da Sie jedoch nicht gegen ein Ass aufgeben können, wird der Hausvorteil um etwa 0,4% erhöht, so dass der effektive Gesamtvorteil bei etwa 0,32% liegt.
How frequently should we move on to the next lesson?
The GameMaster originally used these lessons in a weekly course, so one lesson a week is a reasonable plan. However, since the material varies widely in its breadth lesson by lesson, you can easily just adapt the schedule to your progress.
can I just ask something here, you say that johnny clueless doesnt have an impact in the long run, so how to you explan your matsmatics to the guy who playing his last $2000 on his last hand and johnny takes the dealers bust card? i would love to hear you explain this to me? my emai is [email protected] I await your caculated answer.
I think this has been answered often enough in the comments on this thread. But, being ever the optimist, I’ll make one more foray into it…
People who think that third base can effect their chances are basically espousing this belief: “If the dealer gets the next card off the deck, all is well, but if the dealer gets the second card off the deck instead (after third base takes a card), the dealer is more likely to beat the whole table.” Surely when I state it that way you can see that this is nonsense. If not, well, just believe whatever you like and we’ll leave it at that.
Ich bräuchte etwas Hilfe bei meinen Überlegungen zum Cut-Card-Effekt bei einem Schuhspiel. Ich bin es gewohnt, ein Shoe-Spiel mit acht Decks zu spielen, wobei die Cut-Karte etwa drei Decks vor dem Ende platziert wird, so dass nur fünf der acht Decks ausgegeben werden.
Ich habe den Eindruck, dass bei diesem System die Cut Card den Spielern hilft. Wenn die Vorderseite des Schuhs reich an hohen Karten ist, werden mehr Blätter ausgeteilt. Wenn er viele niedrige Karten enthält, werden weniger Blätter ausgeteilt. Daher können die Spieler mehr Hände spielen, wenn der Schuh günstig ist, und weniger Hände, wenn er ungünstig ist. Bei einer Penetration von nur fünf Kartendecks in einem Schuh mit acht Kartendecks sieht es also so aus, als ob die Cut Card den Spielern der Basisstrategie zugute kommt.
Habe ich etwas verpasst?
Hier ist eine großartige Seite über den Effekt der ausgeschnittenen Karten und die Auswirkungen, die er hat:
https://www.blackjackincolor.com/blackjackeffects1.htm
Ich verstehe, warum Ihre Version plausibel klingt, aber das ist nicht ganz das, was passiert. Stellen Sie es sich stattdessen so vor... Wenn die Vorderseite des Schuhs reich an hohen Karten ist, ist es wahrscheinlicher, dass Sie eine oder zwei zusätzliche Hände spielen müssen, nachdem all diese guten Karten bereits weg sind.
Beachten Sie, dass der Effekt nicht von einer bestimmten Penetration abhängig ist. Er tritt immer dann auf, wenn das Spiel einen festen Mischungspunkt verwendet.
Hallo Ken,
Thanks for creating this great website and I like the discussion here as well.
my local casinos use machine shuffle for all $5 min tables(shuffle ever one deck), hand shuffle for $10 min tables.
I have to sit at $10 table if I am going to counting,but if I only have $1,000 bankroll, do your have some strategy for the people who don’t have enough bankroll to play? or should I wait until I get $10,000 bankroll?
I answered a similar question recently here:
https://www.blackjackinfo.com/blackjack-school/lesson-08-money-management-part-2/#comment-23543
The idea of taking a shot with a too-small bankroll is often referred to as a “Hail Mary” bankroll. If you are willing to accept the risk of losing it all and then having to raise another bank, it’s a viable plan. Just don’t get yourself into a situation where you don’t have enough bankroll left to split and double appropriately.
Mr. Ryan
I love to hear from Ken about your question. But I will give you my two cents worth of opinion. It’s just back luck!! Johnny can took away the good card from dealer and make you win that hand too. Then you will be $2000 ahead. Then you should quit going to casino forever, so that you will be ahead $2000 , because that will be your last hand playing blackjack. Good luck!
Hallo Ken,
I dont get it 12 vs. 5 stand at – 1 or higher what i understand too many cards in the decks so i need to hit again is that the correct move? And what why is it -1 count is higher than -3 or above?thanks
Just to describe it more fully… With 12v5, if the true count is worse than -1, you should hit. That means at negative true counts such as -2 or -3, you should hit. The negative count is telling you that there are excess small cards left, decreasing the chance that you will bust by hitting, and also decreasing the chance that the dealer will bust. At a true count of -1 or better (-1, 0, +1, etc), you should stand. Note that this corresponds with basic strategy, which says to stand with 12v5.
You also asked “Why is it -1 count is higher than -3 or above?” If I understand the question correctly, just think back to the number line in school where you probably first saw negative numbers… -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3, +4, +5. So yes, -1 is higher than -3.
I recently had some feedback from “LV-Bär” suggesting that using the terms “better” or “worse”, would be less confusing for some readers than “higher” or “lower”. I agree. If I revamp the GameMaster’s lessons, I will likely make that switch.
Thank you very much for your prompt replying.
I have another question, I just find out that in your lesson 20 you play $10 min with a $3,000 bankroll. does $3,000 bankroll can be enough for all the loss in one session if I can count and play properly with 1-6 spread ? do I have to take $3,000 cash in my pocket when I am going to play?(silly question for sure but like to know) Thanks,
You will not need $3000 in one session with a max bet of $60. I would recommend $1000.
Ive been playing on your trainer web getting ready to go to the casino. I noticed that amount won many times is not added to the total. I thoutht maybe I was making a mistake but after careful watching of several hundred hands I confirmed that to be the case. Kind of makes me wonder if the rest of the software has a problem.
Check it out and let me know what gives. Great website otherwise.
No, there is no problem with the paying of winning hands in the free game. The confusion comes from the way that your balance increases after the hand, and then immediately decreases again as the next bet is automatically made. Many people only notice the second part and think their balance is going down after a winning hand.
Hallo Ken
Mein Casino hier hat die Regeln für Blackjack: 6 Decks, CSM, D beliebige 2 Karten, DAS, weiche 17, frühe Übergabe, keine Spitze, aber keine Übergabe, wenn die Bank A hat. Ihre Basisstrategie-Engine sagt, dass der Bankier einen Vorteil von -.08% hat. Das bedeutet, dass der Spieler .08% gegen die Bank hat?
Danke.
Wenn Sie früh und vollständig aufgeben würden, auch gegen ein Ass, wäre das korrekt. Der Spieler würde einen kleinen Vorteil haben.
Da Sie jedoch nicht gegen ein Ass aufgeben können, wird der Hausvorteil um etwa 0,4% erhöht, so dass der effektive Gesamtvorteil bei etwa 0,32% liegt.
Vielen Dank, Herr Smith. Jetzt weiß ich, warum ich immer noch verliere!! Ha Ha!
Hallo Ken,
have a question. if i play only with positive counts (TC>=2), my bankroll could be smaller than 50 top bets adviced in this lesson?
totally agree. i had a guy hit on 19! yes 19! after me. i had $200 on that hand he had $20. this hand has put me off blackjack for life!